Blog Catalog

Showing posts with label illegal. Show all posts
Showing posts with label illegal. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 28, 2020

Great, Breaking Trumpian News Today


I love this.

Post image


From the article:

A nonpartisan watchdog filed a complaint with the Federal Election Committee (FEC) on Tuesday alleging President Trump’s reelection campaign broke the law by “laundering” $170 million in spending in an effort to conceal payments to people close to the Trump family and campaign.

The 81-page complaint, filed by the Campaign Legal Center (CLC), alleges that former Trump campaign manager Brad Parscale used a “pass-through” company to pay downstream vendors, including Trump campaign members, associates and family members.

“This illegal conduit scheme leaves voters in the dark about the entities working for the Trump campaign, the nature of their services, and the full amount they are paid,” said Brendan Fischer, the CLC’s director of federal reform. “We don’t know all of what is being hidden by this scheme, but we do know that it violates the law.”


Isn't it a beautiful day, campers?


Monday, July 6, 2020

Saturday, May 16, 2020

This President Trump Fires Yet Another Inspector General


Now this President Trump has created his own "Friday Night Massacre." Have you seen this?

Post image



Democrats blasted the Friday-night dismissal as an assault on the rule of law.

Tricky Dick Nixon fired many people for his "Saturday Night Massacre." Trump just destroys our law and laws and government for his "massacre."

The story (bolding added for emphasis). From Politico:

President Donald Trump has removed State Department Inspector General Steve Linick and replaced him with an ally of Vice President Mike Pence — the latest in a series of moves against independent government watchdogs in recent months.

Trump informed Congress of his intent to oust Linick, a Justice Department veteran appointed to the role in 2013 by then President Barack Obama, in a letter to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) on Friday night.


The president said he "no longer" had the "fullest confidence" in Linick and promised to send the Senate a nominee "who has my confidence and who meets the appropriate qualifications." The executive branch is required to notify Congress 30 days ahead of time if it intends to remove an inspector general.

Trump's move infuriated Democrats who say he's trying to circumvent oversight of his administration, undermining the ability of other branches to hold him accountable. The move follows Trump's anger at being impeached, but it also comes as the White House struggles to combat the coronavirus pandemic just months before the presidential election.

“The president’s late-night, weekend firing of the State Department inspector general has accelerated his dangerous pattern of retaliation against the patriotic public servants charged with conducting oversight on behalf of the American people," Pelosi said in an statement. "Inspector General Linick was punished for honorably performing his duty to protect the Constitution and our national security, as required by the law and by his oath."

Rep. Eliot L. Engel (D-N.Y.), chairman of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs, called Linick's dismissal an "outrageous act of a president trying to protect one of his most loyal supporters, the secretary of State, from accountability."

Engel claimed: "I have learned that the Office of the Inspector General had opened an investigation into Secretary Pompeo. Mr. Linick’s firing amid such a probe strongly suggests that this is an unlawful act of retaliation."

A Democratic congressional aide said Linick had launched an investigation into Pompeo’s alleged misuse of a political appointee to perform personal tasks for him and Mrs. Pompeo. The State Department did not respond to an inquiry about the allegation.


So check that out.  You, Mike Pompeo, are being investigated for misusing your office, having staff run private errands for you and the Mrs. so what do you do? Why, you see to it the Inspector General who was investigating you is let go and then replaced with someone who's friendly to you and the Vice President.

And then look who Trump is proposing to take over this soon to be vacant position:

A State Department spokesperson said that Amb. Stephen Akard, a former career Foreign Service officer, "will now lead the Office of the Inspector General at the State Department" in an acting capacity.

Akard had in 2017 been nominated to serve as the director general of the Foreign Service, a high-ranking human resources role.

That nomination upset veteran U.S. diplomats, who said Akard lacked the long tenure of service usually required for such a prestigious position. The American Academy of Diplomacy even wrote an unusual letter opposing his nomination.

Akard's nomination as director general was eventually withdrawn, but he was later tapped for a different role,
leading the Office of Foreign Missions, for which he was confirmed in September 2019.



Keep in mind, too, folks, this is far from the first government Inspector General this President and his administration have let go. Far from it. This is at least the fourth Inspector General dismissed in this administration and all under at least suspicious circumstances. This is completely unprecedented in Presidential administrations.

How many things, how much does this President have to do, THAT;S BLATANTLY ILLEGAL, mind you, until he's finally, finally held accountable?

What's it going to take?

I don't care if the Republicans DO control the US Senate.

Do our national, American laws mean NOTHING?

How long are we going to tolerate this President and his lawlessness, America?




Thursday, May 14, 2020

What They're Saying On the Internet About This President and Our Coming Election


Literally, I saw this on Facebook two days ago.  What they're saying about this President Trump and the coming election. They may well have a point. Points. (Edited slightly and 2 comments added in parentheses). Author unknown.

Post image

Trump is getting increasingly desperate about his ever-dwindling chance of being reelected in November.

Why? Because he knows what awaits him if he loses his so-called "presidential immunity" which, by the way, in my humble opinion, should be abolished. When he becomes a "civilian," Trump knows that he faces endless litigation to attempt to defend himself in both the Districe of New York and the State of New Jersey for many very serious offenses. Some of these are:

  1. The 2016 Russian election attack
  2. His own election campaign's possible--likely? apparent?--collusion with Russia to get elected
  3. Wikileaks 
  4. Middle Eastern influence (on the Trump administration I feel sure they mean)
  5. Paul Manafort’s activities 
  6. The Trump Tower Moscow project 
  7. Russia-Trump Campaign contacts 
  8. Presidential obstruction of justice 
  9. Campaign finance violations and Trump Organization finances 
  10. Inauguration funding 
  11. SuperPAC funding 
  12. Foreign lobbying violations 
  13. Russian spy Maria Butina 
  14. Russian Internet Research Agency accountant Elena Alekseevna Khusyaynova 
  15. Turkish influence (not certain what they mean here)
  16. Trump Organization tax fraud
  17. Trump Foundation fraud 
  18. Violations of the emoluments clause 
  19. Lawsuits from a VERY LONG list of unpaid creditors
I'm sure there will be an additional tsunami of litigation by grieving and very angry surviving family members of the tens of thousands of people who needlessly died as a result of the COVID-19 virus,  caused from Trump's endless excuses, disastrous mismanagement, his complete lack of leadership and his overwhelming criminal negligence in this disaster, which is obviously still ongoing and will be ongoing for long into the future.

Trump's insistence on "opening up the country," by HIS own twisted reasoning "to improve the economy," is an EXCUSE and a LIE. It's only for the purpose of promoting himself for one more four-year term of horror in the Oval Office, thereby allowing Trump to escape what awaits him if he loses reelection.

WE CANNOT ALLOW ONE MORE TRUMP TERM OF HORROR!

WE MUST VOTE HIM OUT IN NOVEMBER! 

VOTE BLUE!


Monday, May 11, 2020

The Now Frightening United States of America


Richard Nixon made me mad.


Featured Image












We're concerned, sure, but even those around him get and and are concerned.


And then there was this beauty, not that long ago.


I could go on.

Frightening.  This President is honestly frightening. And in more than one way.

God help us. Again, God help us.


Sunday, May 10, 2020

The SNL Hall of Presidents


You would never have thought we'd--meaning Republicans--would do worse, and so very much worse, than Richard M Nixon, would you?

Or Ronnie the Raygun with his very illegal Iran-Contra arms sales?

Or Dubya'?  Clueless Dubya' with his evil, heartless, waterboarding leader in the Vice President's office?

And yet here is Donald J "Don the Con", "Don the John" Trump.


Thanks, Republicans!


Friday, May 8, 2020

Americans Need to Know What Just Happened In and To Our Justice System


Yes, every adult American needs to know and be fully aware just what, exactly, took place in and to our justice system yesterday. It starts here.

Post image

The Justice Department has dropped Michael Flynn’s case


It seems Attorney General William Barr had up to now guilty Michael Flynn freed from his guilty convictions.

Michael Flynn was formally found guilty in our courts, in our justice system and this administration just overturned that finding.

Everyone needs to know, remember, keep in mind that Michael Flynn plead guilty---twice---formally, officially, in a court of law to lying to the FBI. Perjury. One of the worst offenses, short of murder, one can be found guilty.

Now this.


The Trump administration’s Justice Department is undermining the rule of law.


For months, President Trump has suggested that he might pardon retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, his former national security adviser, who pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI. But now Trump won’t have to worry about it: Attorney General William P. Barr filed a motion Thursday asking the federal court overseeing Flynn’s case to dismiss the charges.

If he is successful, Barr will save Trump from the political fallout of pardoning a former close aide, while still clearing Flynn. A pardon might have seemed to be the ultimate perversion of justice — but Barr’s maneuver is actually much, much worse.

Flynn lied to the FBI in early 2017 about a conversation he had with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak when Flynn was a member of the Trump transition team. Flynn’s conversation involved mollifying Russia immediately after the Obama administration expelled 35 Russian spies and imposed sanctions as punishment for its interference in the 2016 election. When interviewed by the FBI about his conversation with Kislyak, Flynn lied, despite knowing — as he undoubtedly would, as the former head of the Defense Intelligence Agency — that doing so was a crime.


The fact that he would lie to the FBI, which is charged with protecting the country’s national security, raised the concern that he might be compromised by a foreign power — a concern that Barr’s current motion to the court claims that the FBI should have ignored. In fact, Barr’s motion to the court echoes the request Trump made to the bureau’s then-director, James B. Comey, in February 2017, when he asked Comey to “see [his] way clear to letting Flynn go” — a request that landed Trump in the middle of an investigation into obstruction of justice...


'Transparently Corrupt': Barr Lets Flynn Off Scot-Free 



"The head of the American justice system now saying publicly that there is no good or bad except what the strongest want," said another critic. "The definition of autocracy."

And today, now, it seems this President Trump is even honestly making things worse for himself by---wait for it---shooting off his mouth. Further. Check this out.




During a Friday morning phone interview on Fox News' morning show, "Fox and Friends," President Donald Trump said he's studied history and "learned a lot from Richard Nixon," while reflecting on the federal investigation into his 2016 campaign's ties to Russia.



The president said one of his key lessons came from Nixon, who resigned in 1974 while facing almost-certain impeachment after directing the criminal Watergate break-in. Taped conversations illustrating Nixon's involvement in the criminal conspiracy and his attempts to cover up the wrongdoing by firing top aides helped seal his fate. 



"I learned a lot from Richard Nixon. Don't fire people," Trump said.

"Only the best people..."

Remember that?

Image may contain: 1 person, possible text that says 'Garry Kasparov @Kasparov63 Corrupt regimes don't fight crime, they legalize it. They don't chase the crooks, they hire them. They don't stop lying, they tell you the truth is whatever they say. twitter er.com/mrbromwich/sa.. Michael R. Bromwich @mrbromwi... 18h have been in and around DOJ since 1983. have never seen a case dropped after someone has pled guilty and the underlying facts demonstrate beyond any shadow of a doubt he is guilty. This is simply a pardon by another'

Thanks, Republicans.

God help us all.

God forgive and help us all.

Thursday, July 5, 2018

If This President Never Concerned You...


If this President and Presidency hasn't, to date, concerned you, he and it should now.

Image result for stupid trump


US president briefed not to mention the topic at dinner with leaders from four Latin American allies – but he did so anyway

Why on Earth would we, the United States, invade and attack Venezuela?

Because they're Socialists?

And then, when you get there, what do you do? Whom do you attack? What, precisely, would you be trying to do and/or undo?

What the heck?


Wednesday, November 25, 2015

On This Day, 1986















U.S. President Reagan and Attorney Gen. Edwin Meese revealed that profits from secret arms sales to Iran had been diverted to rebels in Nicaragua. 

National Security Advisor John Poindexter resigned and Oliver North was fired.

Nothing came of the federal laws being broken.

Nothing. Ever.

To this day, legions of Americans have nothing but praise for Ronald Reagan.


Thursday, August 23, 2012

No laws about throwing away or trashing government computers?


I keep remembering that ol' Mittens Romney had computers erased and destroyed on his way out of office back in Massachusetts, when he was governor. Did you read or hear about it?

Mitt Romney administration deleted emails before leaving office

"It doesn't appear to have been illegal, but this, from the Boston Globe, doesn't make Mitt Romney's administration look particularly open and transparent:

Just before Mitt Romney left the Massachusetts governor’s office and first ran for president, 11 of his top aides purchased their state-issued computer hard drives, and the Romney administration’s e-mails were all wiped from a server, according to interviews and records obtained by the Globe.

Romney administration officials had the remaining computers in the governor’s office replaced just before Governor Deval Patrick’s staff showed up to take power in January 2007 … Beth E. Myers, who was Romney’s chief of staff, bought her hard drive on Aug. 18, 2006, the same month that she left state employment.

Peter G. Flaherty, who was Romney’s deputy chief of staff, bought the hard drive from his computer on Nov. 3, 2006 ... Flaherty later became the Romney campaign’s chief liaison to social conservatives."


I don't mind telling you folks here and I think most, if not all, would agree, first, I think this is wrong since these were government computers, reputedly doing government--the people's--work.

Second, I think this could, of course, likely cover up things that otherwise shouldn't have happened.

Third, and most importantly, I think it needs to be said and acted on that this is made illegal--very strictly and clearly illegal--in each and every of the 50 states, all our cities and counties and then in our Federal Government, too.

Every government employee--every one of them--needs to be held accountable for their actions and official words and deeds. These are OUR computers, people, again, supposedly doing our work. It shouldn't be possible to be able to either sell these computers or trash the information on them.

Making this illegal would make our representatives at least somewhat more accountable for their words and actions in office, if not a great deal more.

What troubles me is that there doesn't seem to be an existing outcry for anything like this to happen.

Left as it is, legal to give or throw away this information, will lead to not good things.

If it hasn't already.

Link: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1111/68583.html#ixzz24P4EfJ6I

Wednesday, July 4, 2012

Why we need government--and regulation


Why do we need government? Why do we need government regulations?

Look no further than this headline from The Wall Street Journal a few days ago:

Interest Rate Probe Escalates

Barclays Agrees to Pay Record Fine; Emails Show Traders Tried to Manipulate Libor


Barclays PLC agreed to pay $453 million in fines to U.S. and U.K. regulators after admitting that traders and executives tried to manipulate interest rates tied to loans and financial contracts around the world.

If the 2008 national and international collapses of the world's financial markets weren't enough for you, or the collapse of Enron or the BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, or one of the many other big catastrophes in the last few years weren't enough, this should do it for you.

Barclays Bank, in England, was just big and powerful enough to do their best to try to manipulate international interest rates to go in their favor. This, this is why we need something bigger and stronger than corporations--to control them. To keep their greed in check.

If you don't either already know this or understand it, you need to see one of the many documentaries on these collapses.

We need government as an independent check on corporations and the world's wealthy.

This, above, got Barclays a nearly half billion dollar fine.

And the thing is, the examination is still going on.

Who knows what they did we don't know?

As if that isn't enough, Glaxo-Smith-Kline of the pharmaceutical industry was also fined. This time for three billion dollars--that's $3 billion--for fraud, for stealing from the American public:

GlaxoSmithKline Settles Largest Health Care Fraud Case In U.S. History

WASHINGTON (AP) — GlaxoSmithKline LLC will pay $3 billion and plead guilty to promoting two popular drugs for unapproved uses and to failing to disclose important safety information on a third in the largest health care fraud settlement in U.S. history, the Justice Department said Monday.

The $3 billion fine also will be the largest penalty ever paid by a drug company, Deputy Attorney General James M. Cole said. The corporation also agreed to be monitored by government officials for five years to attempt to ensure the company's compliance, Cole said.


Small government? Sure. You bet.

No government? Not a chance. Weak government? Ditto. No, thank you.

So, Libertarians, you can count me out, thanks very much.

Link to original article: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304830704577493092589081130.html

"Inside Job" (documentary): http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1645089/

"Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room": http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1016268/

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/02/gsk-fraud_n_1643186.html

Monday, May 28, 2012

On this Memorial Day

Let's face it, if we really "respected our troops", we wouldn't have sent them in harm's way, first in Iraq, for the chosen, arbitrary, unnecessary, ignorant-to-the-point-of-stupid and illegal war that was and then into Afghanistan, where those people didn't want us, either.

We have George W. Bush and Dick Cheney to thank--rather, to hold responsible--for both.

They are war criminals, by their own words. We should hold them accountable, charge them and put them on trial.

We won't. We never will.

But we should.

Thursday, April 26, 2012

Republicans' current complaint of the President

Karl Rove's "American Crossroads" group put out a video today, complaining that President Obama is, apparently, "too cool": Apparently they'd prefer we'd return to Mitt Romney, so we can have more things like this: God forbid. What a disaster that's been for us, to this day. And for them to complain about the state of our economy when they're so blatanly, obviously impeding the nation's progress is rich. And absurdly hypocritical. It's disgusting.

Friday, January 6, 2012

If you're even thinking Rick Santorum

Rick Santorum's anti-birth control, anti-gay bluster hide his other persona: the man who preaches one standard while living another. The details are provided in an excellent expose by Philadelphia writer Will Bunch whose complete article appears at the link below. Here is a quick summary: (1) Started a Christian charity whose funds primarily went to lobbyists, aides and Santorum fund raisers. Only 36% went to charities. (2) The Santorum Leadership PAC money was more like his personal Fun Fund including 66 trip to Starbucks and purchases at multiple fast food and Big Box stores, all for personal use, all illegal by the way. (3) While supposedly crusading to the bedside of Terri Schiavo, Santorum flew the Wal-Mart corporate jet there to pick up a quarter million dollar check from Outback Steakhouse execs to keep low minimum wages for low wage earners. (4) Santorum rails against government waste yet PA taxpayers paid $72,000 to home school his children living in Virginia! (5) He was the Senate's "point man" on the K Street lobbyist project, working closely with "fiscal terrorist" Grover Norquist and convicted felon Tom DeLay. (6) He was such an important supporter of Big Pharma that when Santorum was defeated for a third senate term, the major drug companies said his departure "creates a big hole." (7) Despite being unemployed last year, Santorum made almost one million dollars peddling influence. He breathes and eats WealthCare for the richest Americans. This man does NOT qualify to be president of anything, let alone America. Link: http://www.philly.com/philly/​blogs/attytood/​The-Santorum-that-America-doesn​t-know.html — with John A. Leopard, Marlene Fisher, Gloria Lemos and Ginger Snaps, from Facebook

Wednesday, January 4, 2012

What's going on with Americans?

What's up with Americans today? What has happened to America? The America I knew? The tough, smart one? I see, hear and read so much paranoia and suspicion anymore, it's shocking. There is expectation of much ugliness and evil and huge "powers that be" and it's surprising and new to me. It seems paranoid and really gets tiresome. We had a financial collapse in 2008, we elected a black man president in 2010 and lots of large weather anomalies have taken place in the recent past. That and a lot of people have lost their jobs or their socio-economic status and still others are having to get used to women having more power and clout in our society possibly. I understand all that but the suspicion or paranoia or whatever it is is really getting out of hand. I've never known Americans to be like this. What brings this about is a conversation on Facebook with "friends" due to this video: People were saying it's chemtrails they think and that the government must be poisoning us, instead of just jet contrails. And sure, it could, remotely be possible. Governments around the world have done some of this stuff. England recently admitted to doing it from the 40's to the 70's but honestly, I see and hear so many people saying that it's "the end of the world", literally, and that the government is preparing to either kill us, like this, or heard us all into FEMA camps and it gets really old. Here's the thing, if everyone's so upset now, why weren't they raising hell when that white moral and mental midget George W. Bush was spending us into oblivion, giving away tax cuts to his already-obscenely rich friends and taking us into a horrible, tragic, needless, mindless, nationally and internationally illegal war in Iraq? Where were these people then? Why didn't they raise hell about the honky who was screwing things up? I'd love to know. Link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemtrail_conspiracy_theory

Thursday, December 15, 2011

The official end of the Iraq War

On this, the official end of the Iraq War, it's so vitally important to remember a few things, at least: 1.5 million American soldiers served, 4,487 American Soldiers lost their lives, 32.226 American Soldiers were wounded, $806 billion were spent on it, it was a longer war than WWII or Vietnam, no weapones of mass destruction were ever found--just as the United Nations inspectors were verifying--and it was all based on lies. (Tragically, this doesn't even take into consideration the destruction of the Iraqi country and so many Iraqi lives). Link: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/16/world/middleeast/panetta-in-baghdad-for-iraq-military-handover-ceremony.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all

Friday, April 22, 2011

Good on you, Mr. ElBaradei

From the news today:

ElBaradei suggests war crimes probe of Bush team     

By CHARLES J. HANLEY, AP Special Correspondent

NEW YORK – Former chief U.N. nuclear inspector Mohamed ElBaradei suggests in a new memoir that Bush administration officials should face international criminal investigation for the "shame of a needless war" in Iraq.

Freer to speak now than he was as an international civil servant, the Nobel-winning Egyptian accuses U.S. leaders of "grotesque distortion" in the run-up to the 2003 Iraq invasion, when then-President George W. Bush and his lieutenants claimed Iraq possessed doomsday weapons despite contrary evidence collected by ElBaradei's and other arms inspectors inside the country.


The Iraq war taught him that "deliberate deception was not limited to small countries ruled by ruthless dictators," ElBaradei writes in "The Age of Deception," being published Tuesday by Henry Holt and Company.
And I'll tell you, I'm all for this investigation--an impartial one--not for retribution or vengeance or any other reason but that this way, hopefully, we would make certain that history doesn't repeat.

As Mr. ElBaradei states:  "Do we, as a community of nations, have the wisdom and courage to take the corrective measures needed, to ensure that such a tragedy will never happen again?"
That said, an investigation will never happen, sadly, as no one has the "guts" or chutzpah or fortitude, whatever you want to call it, to even begin it, let alone see it through.  The American people aren't calling for it and don't have the will for it.  In spite of how illegal attacking Iraq was and is both nationally, internally, here in the US and the fact that it's quite against international law, George W. Bush and Co. will get away with this travesty and travesty of justice.  
They will have told many lies, broken laws, been responsible for thousands of needless deaths and hundreds of thousands of wounded people and gotten away with it all, scott-free.

Monday, March 28, 2011

Laughing at Kansas today on Yahoo! News

Yep.  There's an article over there at Yahoo! News today on "Weird Traffic Laws" and who should show up but our next-door neighbor, the glorious state of Kansas.  And why not?  Here it is:


Weird Traffic Laws

10 of the weirdest, wackiest traffic laws in America
By Cindy Perman

You know the basic traffic laws — stop at a red light, obey the speed limit, don’t drink and drive.

But this is America, land of the free and home of the make-it-up-as-you-go-along, so in addition to the standard traffic laws, there are some weird and wacky ones out there.

Some of them are specific to activities common in that town or state, and some of them make you wonder why someone had to tell you it’s illegal to do that.
10. Screeeeeeeeeeeech!


In Kansas, it is illegal to screech your tires. That's a state law, but there are also local ordinances to back it up.

In Derby, Kansas, for example, it's part of a standard traffic ordinance that any act which causes or creates "unnecessary rapid acceleration, unnecessary tire squeal, skid, smoke or slide upon acceleration or stopping including the casting of tread, gravel, dirt or other road surface materials from the tires" is illegal. Also any acts that "simulate a temporary race."


The penalty is a fine up to $500 and/or imprisonment up to 30 days.

Good luck enforcing this one.  

Oh, and isn't it great the authorities in Kansas are going after the "big guys" in crime here and not wasting their time on the petty criminals that don't matter?

On the plus side is that they're in last place, at number 10.

Kansas can count it's blessings on that one.  At least they're not the worst.

Tuesday, January 25, 2011

Talk about over-legislating

Okay, here we go.  This is what the Libertarians and maybe the Tea Party members are complaining about.  Talk about too much government.

Two states--Arkansas and New York, if you can believe that--are considering making walking or running while you text illegal:

2 states take aim at distracted walkers, runners


And who's going to police this?  The police?  They don't have enough to do?

My Conservative, long-dead, I believe Republican uncle once made a terrific statement I never forgot:  "You can't legislate us to utopia."

I didn't agree with a lot of his politics but I certainly agreed with that one.

Naturally, that came to mind here, with these goofy ideas.

Link:  http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110124/ap_on_re_us/us_distracted_walkers

Friday, February 26, 2010

At what point will elected politicians understand?

First, we get a report from The Kansas City Star, just earlier this week, that a bunch of our elected pols took a pretty good deal of corporate paid-for trips--junkets--and that they also, illegally, didn't report and now comes word--as if we're surprised--that "The House Ethics Committee says 20-term Democratic Congressman Charlie Rangel repeatedly violated ethics rules by accepting corporate money for lavish trips to the Caribbean."

And this is just the latest for Charlie Rangel: "Rangel, chairman of the powerful House Ways & Means Committee, also faces investigations into his use of office resources to raise money for a college center bearing his name and his failure to report hundreds of thousands of dollars in assets and income."

It's so frustrating.

All these people feel as though, apparently, that as long as the American people don't raise cane (cain?) about it, it's okay--that if they just "get by with it," even though it's illegal, that all will be well.

I assume they figure "If everyone else is doing it, I can, too."

How else can you explain such blatant disregard for ethics, the appearance of really poor judgement and virtually total disregard for law?

If a business or business person is paying for your trip to New York City or the Masters tournament or Japan (which is what Missouri representatives all did) or, as in the case of Charlie Rangel, a trip (trips?) to the Carribbean, how do you accept that trip as an elected representative and not know it's at least unethical, if not downright illegal?

What, are you stupid?

And we're sick of it.

It's not as though this is anything new, certainly, and we all know that but it just seems the graft and appearance of graft and unethical behavior is going beyond the pale in an atmosphere that, otherwise, needs a great deal of attention.

As taxpayers, as voters, as citizens, we are sick of our representatives taking care of themselves first, last and foremost, and then, incidentally doing a little of the public's business by voting on this or that, almost as a sideline.

They have fantastic health care, as elected officials--at least in the US Congress.

We certainly don't.

They have wildly lavish pensions to take care of them later in life, once they're off the public dole.

Again, corporate America has seen to it we don't have that option.

They have travel and franking (postage), both, budgets we don't have.

And in the meantime, America is kind of going to heck in a handbasket, economically and financially, in case they haven't noticed but who are they taking care of?

Themselves.

It's time for this party to be stopped.

We need to raise hell and get the kind of representatives and government we deserve.

Let's start by throwing Charlie Rangel out of Congress.