Tuesday, April 13, 2021
A Republican -- On Republicans
Thursday, January 7, 2021
This Unbelievable President and Presidency
Once again, this President leaves me disbelieving just where, exactly, we all, as a nation, are.
And that is, we are, it seems clear, stuck with this greedy, absurd, self-centered, selfish, ignorant, reckless, now obviously dangerous dolt for a few more days. Thirteen to be exact. That and we just have to hope and maybe pray, if we do that sort of thing, that he doesn't do anything else stupid. That is a tall, tall order for this man, as we've repeatedly seen in the last 4 years.
One outcome of all this, sort of shallow as it is, is that he's suspended, indefinitely, on Facebook and Instagram.
Think of that.
Not a teenager but no less than this Republican Party President is blocked from posting on social media because he tells so many untruths--read: lies--and emotionally incites his followers. Again, unreal. For any other President, this would be unthinkable, unbelievable. Heck, for any other adult it would be unheard of.
Then there's his administration. People are now, no big surprise, bailing on him and it all, and left and right. There have been 9 quit so far with the most notable being Elaine Chao. Yes, THAT Elaine Chao. None other than Senator Mitch McConnell's own wife.
Then there's very Right Wing nutjob Mick Mulvaney. He quit, too. It was too crazy in Trump's White House now even for him. You can the rest of the list of the people who have so far, to this minute, bailed here:
Everyone Who Has Quit the Trump Administration After Wednesday’s Anarchy
If we nominate Trump, we will get destroyed.......and we will deserve it.— Lindsey Graham (@LindseyGrahamSC) May 3, 2016
No one other than President Donald Trump himself is more responsible for Wednesday’s coup attempt at the U.S. Capitol than one Joshua David Hawley, the 41-year-old junior senator from Missouri, who put out a fundraising appeal while the siege was underway.
This, Sen. Hawley, is what law-breaking and destruction look like. This is not a protest, but a riot. One woman who was apparently part of the pro-Trump mob was fatally shot by Capitol Police as lawmakers took cover. Some of those whose actions Trump encouraged and later condoned brought along their Confederate flags.
And no longer can it be asked, as George Will did recently of Hawley, “Has there ever been such a high ratio of ambition to accomplishment?” Hawley’s actions in the last week had such impact that he deserves an impressive share of the blame for the blood that’s been shed.
Hawley was first to say that he would oppose the certification of Joe Biden’s Electoral College win. That action, motivated by ambition, set off much that followed — the rush of his fellow presidential aspirant Texas Sen. Ted Cruz and other members of the Sedition Caucus to put a show of loyalty to the president above all else.
Tuesday, June 9, 2020
Three of This President's Best Critics
3 favorites of mine to read in this Age of Trump:
- David Frum
- George Will
- Bill Kristol

Search Results
Tuesday, June 2, 2020
Please Read This Article
I can't emphasize enough reading very conservative, Republican Party supporting George Will's article on this President, his political party and his enablers.

Just a bit from it:
"A political party’s primary function is to bestow its imprimatur on candidates, thereby proclaiming: This is who we are. In 2016, the Republican Party gave its principal nomination to a vulgarian and then toiled to elect him. And to stock Congress with invertebrates whose unswerving abjectness has enabled his institutional vandalism, who have voiced no serious objections to his Niagara of lies, and whom T.S. Eliot anticipated:
We whisper together
Are quiet and meaningless
As wind in dry grass
or rats’ feet over broken glass . . .
My Biggest Concern About This President--and His Political Party
"The Week" hit the nail on the head currently.

No overstatement, no exaggeration. A bit from the article:
Mass unrest engulfed cities across the United States over the weekend, as thousands of people protested the Minneapolis police killing of George Floyd and police typically responded with violence. In some relatively isolated cases, riots and looting broke out — including in Washington, D.C., where President Trump turned off the lights at the White House and hid in a bunker.
It seems the United States was a powder keg just waiting for a spark. Police incompetence and brutality — carried out at enormous expense to the American taxpayer — have only added to the intolerable daily burden of poverty and misery experienced by the American working class, particularly its black and brown members. The fabric of America is coming apart.
I don’t think it’s an exaggeration to say that America as we know it is on the brink.
How did we get here? The core story of U.S. politics over the past four decades is that wealthy elites weaponized white racism to gain political power, which they used to pursue policies that enriched the already wealthy at workers’ expense.
Until Trump’s rise it was possible — barely — for people to deny this reality with a straight face. At this point, however, it requires willful blindness not to see what’s going on.
Nor have Trump’s trade wars brought back the good jobs of yore. Even before the coronavirus plunged us into depression, Trump had failed to deliver major employment growth in coal mining or manufacturing. And farmers, who supported Trump by large margins in 2016, have suffered huge losses thanks to his trade wars.
So what has Trump really offered to the white working class that makes up most of his base? Basically, he has provided affirmation and cover for racial hostility.
Meanwhile, this was his Tweet today, 2 hours ago:
Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump·
We have to take our nation back. We have to take it back for the people.
We can do this.
We must.
Tuesday, May 26, 2020
This Trumpian Republican Party
I caught an excellent article, thanks to a friend, over the weekend on this President and what has morphed into his political party:

One of the challenges in analyzing modern American politics is accurately describing the Republican Party without seeming unserious and hyperbolic. Major publications are understandably in the habit of presenting both sides of the partisan divide as being inherently worthy of respect and equal consideration, both as a way of shielding themselves from accusations of bias and as a way of maintaining their own sense of journalistic integrity.
Unfortunately, the modern Republican Party’s abdication of seriousness, good faith and reality-based communications or policy-making has stretched even the most open-minded analyst’s capacity for forced balance. Donald Trump’s own inability to string together coherent or consistent thoughts has led to a bizarre normalization of his statements in the traditional media, as journalists unconsciously try to fit his rambling, spontaneous utterances into a conventional framework. This has come at the cost of Americans seeing the full truth of the crisis of leadership in the Oval Office for what it is. For instance, it was ironically salutary for the American public to witness Donald Trump’s bizarre pandemic press conferences where he oddly attacked reporters for asking innocuous questions and recommended researching bleach and sunlight injections, because they got to see Trump raw as he truly is, without the normalization filter. Republicans have long argued that the “mainstream media filter” gives them a bad shake, but the reality is the opposite: sure, it’s not as good as being boosted by Fox News’ overt propaganda, but it does them a greater service than letting the public see them unfiltered at all...
...Being a Republican now requires believing in a jaw-dropping series of claims that, if true, would almost necessitate anti-democratic revanchism. One has to believe that
- a cabal of evil scientists is making up climate science in exchange for grant money;
- that there is rampant, widescale voter impersonation fraud carried out by thousands of elections officials nationwide;
- that the “Deep State” concocted a scheme to frame Trump for Russian collusion but chose not to use it before the 2016 election;
- that shadowy forces are driving migrant caravans and diseases across American borders in the service of destroying white Republican America;
- that the entire news media is engaged in a conspiracy against the Republican Party;
- that grieving victims of gun violence and their families all across America want to take away guns as a pretext for stomping the boot of “liberal fascism” on conservative faces; and so on.
I personally can't recommend the complete above article enough.
Who does this?
Then there's the fact that this President has repeatedly tried to spread an untrue and extremely irresponsible murder conspiracy theory, of all things, about Joe Scarborough.
Trump uses Twitter to push
murder conspiracy theory
And this was yesterday at the Memorial Day activities. As this President and again, his political party would have it, it's "sleepy Joe" Biden we have to worry about, no one else. And yet...
President Trump’s struggles to stand still during a Memorial Day visit to Arlington National Cemetery lit up social media Monday, prompting users to recall past incidents in which the commander in chief, who turns 74 next month, battled to find a balance.
“Is the President having trouble standing up straight as the National Anthem begins at Arlington Cemetary (sic) or am I seeing things?” Joshua Potash from Queens asked on Twitter.
The Trump critic posted that video, along with another clearly showing the president swaying in front of the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier.
Between this President's ravings, his questionable health and his political party's going off a d eep end, it seems clear we don't lack for things we have to work on, let alone be concerned of.
Thanks, Republicans.
"Only the best people."
"So much winning."
Trump Sabotaged America's Recovery Even Before COVID-19 Began
24 conspiracy theories Donald Trump has floated
6 months on, Trump hasn't completed his physical. The White House won't say why.
Editorial: If the pandemic-preparedness cupboard was bare, it was Trump's doing
Sunday, November 10, 2019
Conservative, Right Wing Republicans on this President

It's an excellent, I think even important column with lots of good to great information and points but, following here, I'll only post this one paragraph from the end:
In 13 months, all congressional Republicans who have not defended Congress by exercising “the constitutional rights of the place” should be defeated. If congressional Republicans continue their genuflections at Trump’s altar, the appropriate 2020 outcome will be a Republican thrashing so severe — losing the House, the Senate and the electoral votes of, say, Georgia, Arizona, North Carolina and even Texas — that even this party of slow-learning careerists might notice the hazards of tethering their careers to a downward-spiraling scofflaw.
Next up, as we go into the beginning of the public hearings from and in the House of Representatives on this President and possible impeachment this week, finally, keep this in mind, too.
And now, from very deeply Right Wing, Conservative, Republican Bill "I Usually Support All Republicans Blindly" Kristol:
Republican Should Challenge Trump in 2020
From earlier this year:
Manchester, N.H. — For the good of the country and the Republican party, Donald Trump has to be challenged from the right in 2020, Weekly Standard editor-at-large Bill Kristol told a friendly crowd of business executives and political insiders here Wednesday morning.
“I don’t know if a challenger would succeed. In my view, I think it’s important to have one just to force the debate,” Kristol said. “I think if Trump were to lose in 2020 it would allow for someone to step up and say, ‘Well, here’s a different way forward than just kind of trying to redo Trump over the next several years.’”
Kristol was the second prominent Never Trumper in as many months to appear at the Politics & Eggs event series, which puts political speakers in front of an audience of New England business leaders who tend to show up in charcoal suits, wearing name tags that flash impressive job titles. Senator Jeff Flake’s anti-Trump speech here at the New Hampshire Institute of Politics drew a standing ovation in April. Attacking Trump from the conservatarian right, Flake flirted with the idea of challenging Trump for the nomination in 2020. (Kristol, who rejects speculation that he might run himself, says he prefers to help find the right challenger, and thinks John Kasich is the most obvious and potentially formidable one.)
After that, let's please, please all keep in mind that it was this President, Donald J "The John" Trump who, this week, was penalized by a judge for--get this--taking 2 million dollars from a charity. And not just any charity, either. This was a charity for American Veterans.
The man given 493 million dollars from his father felt he needed to also take 2 million dollars from a charity for our Veterans.
To date, Republicans have expressed zero regret or remorse for this man.
Zero.
Finally today, I have to ask, in what bizarro world could or would it possibly be okay if a President of the United States were to ask the head of another, foreign nation to investigate any private U.S. citizen, let alone the son of one of his foremost political rivals in the coming national election?
Additional links:
FBI investigated how Trump's actions seemed to benefit Russia
Friday, October 20, 2017
In Case You Missed This Last May
Right Wing, Republican, very conservative columnist George Will wrote an article last May on this President Donald J. Trump. What he observes is beyond important.
Trump has a dangerous disability
- The Washington Post
Additional link:
George Will: Trump disabled by inability to think,
speak clearly | TheHill
Sunday, August 28, 2016
The Incredible, Soon-To-Be Presidency of Hillary Rodham Clinton
...And why it's great for America.
In all of the coverage of this God-awful 2016 presidential race for the White House, what hasn't been said and what isn't being said--yet, anyway--is how the Hilary Clinton presidency will, yes, of course, be historic for the nation and unprecedented, but the ways in which it will be unprecedented.
First, of course, we'll have our first female president.
That, alone, is historic and nearly mind-blowing. For all our work and attempts to be modern and forward and open-minded, not only have we never had a woman president but, worse, there are still far too many people in the nation--both male and female--who think we should never have one. The fact that we will is fantastic.
Second, the fact that we'll have two presidents in the White House at the same time is incredible.
I can't think of any other nation that has had such a situation at any time during their history. It happens, of course, naturally, in monarchies that lead their nations but not in Democratically-elected heads of state. It's, again, unprecedented.
And the thing is, not only is it history-making but the nation gets one helluva bargain at the same time.
Like it or not, agree or not, Bill Clinton, as president, was a very successful one in his time in office. Having all that experience and knowledge and his international and political contacts is a huge boon to her presidency and to the nation and our need to work with other nations.
In that way, you could also say, then, with all that experience and information and knowledge, America is getting one incredible political and governmental bargain. We're getting a "two-fer", America, a two-for-one bargain.
Following on the heels of a successful, very successful presidency of one Barack Hussein Obama and the not-to-be-overlooked fact of his being the first Black president, this is, indeed, again, monumental and historic. It's a great day for America.
Look, don't get me wrong, too. It's not like the election is over, far from it. Things could happen. But I'm basing the reason for this post today on the fact that not only does Mrs. Clinton have a lot of support behind her but she also has a great many Republicans on her side because they are strongly and wisely against having their candidate, Donald J. Trump in the White House. It's just fact.
So, congratulations, America. Not only will you be making history for more equality of the sexes but you'll also be getting one heckuva bargain, financially, diplomatically and politically, all three, at least, with Mrs. and Mr. Clinton back in the White House.
Links:
George Will: Republicans Must Keep Trump Out Of The White House
Donald Trump faces uphill climb to the White House
The Philippines considers permanently banning
Donald Trump
Saturday, June 21, 2014
Question for The Kansas City Star
The St. Louis Post-Dispatch rather quickly--and wisely, I think--ended publishing Right Wing columnist George Will after his first article on rape that was strongly anti-women.
Now, Mr. Will is at least "doubling-down" on his comments and defending them:
George Will Stands By His Incendiary Sexual Assault Column
I love that he also tries to blame, in this video, the Obama administration for his situation.
So the question is, Star, how soon until you do the same?
Thursday, June 19, 2014
Hopefully the Kansas City Star will follow suit
This was announced yesterday:
Saint Louis Post Dispatch dumps columnist George Will
Sunday, March 18, 2012
George Will, Uber-Conservative, on Afghanistan
Monday, September 26, 2011
Right wing ignorance on Sunday's op/ed page in The Star
Sunday, June 27, 2010
Milestones, Sunday, June 26, 2010
Sunday, February 21, 2010
Thoughts on a Sunday morning
Whenever that happens, I'm a little stunned. This is the 2nd time I can think it's happened.
Mr. McClanahan points out that eliminating the e-tax would be irresponsible if it's not replaced with some other tax of some kind, so the $200 million raised by this tax is done away with.
But his bigger point is that a "land tax" would make much more sense because it rewards development in the city, instead of pushing people out of the city, like the e-tax, and the property tax, which punishes and disincentivizes (I think that's a word) even the purchase of property, let alone development of it.
Good on Mr. McClanahan. This is a really eye-opening and educational column.
It would be great if a representative or better yet, some representatives in Jeff city would study this land tax option.
--Donna Brazile is terrfic.
She's most usually seen and heard, if at all, on ABC's "This Week" news program on Sunday morning.
She's smart and gives terrific, intelligent insights on American politics and society.
What's sad and unfortunate is that she's also one of very few people of color who are on the weekly sunday morning news shows. To my knowledge, she may be the only one.
--John McLaughlin (of The McLaughlin Group on PBS) is losing it, it seems.
Out of the blue this week, when they were discussing the Tiger Woods' apology this week, he asked his guests if they thought Tiger might one day run for political office.
Wth?
Seriously, John?
His guests paused at first, then laughed off the question.
Oh, and his show covered Tiger's apology before addressing Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's statement from earlier in the week that suggested Iran is becoming a military dictatorship.
Great priorities, Mr. McLaughlin.
Not.
--The Tiger Woods apology this week is the biggest non-story of the week, at least, if not the year.
The interest in it stuns me.
Other than his family, friends, golfers and people in the golfing industry, why the interest? It seems clearly purient.
--I was watching the Sunday morning news shows, obviously, with its scroll at the bottom, given our ice/snow storm, when I was reminded of one of my favorite abbreviations.
It's COGIC or Church of God in Christ.
I've always thought that was cute, downright funny and a great counterpoint of simple, clear, unemotional and rational thinking or
LOGIC.
Enjoy your Sunday, everyone.
Monday, August 31, 2009
Health care situation doesn't look good
Whether it's The McGlaughlin Report or The Week with George Stephanopoulos or, God forbid, of course, Bill O'Reilly or Glenn Beck and the Fox Network,etc., the support of the corporations comes through.
George Will and Liz Cheney, naturally, spew the lines and sound eloquent, so people might think they're correct.
And of course they're not, plainly.
Our American health care system is badly, badly broken and is financially breaking American citizen's households because we have the most expensive health care system in the world and that story is, I think, completely lost.
All these people have to do is instill fear, ala' George W. Bush's techniques, which they've clearly learned so well, and health care reform, to benefit us all, seems unlikely to pass.
Sad.
Really sad.
Sunday, August 30, 2009
Liz Cheney needs to go away
She shows up again and again on news shows and all because of her last name.
Today, she outdid herself.
Ms. Cheney was on "This Week with George Stephanopoulos" on ABC and she not only put out here obnoxious opinions, which would be bad enough, but now she's introduced right-wing, shout-down-the-opposition, Bill O'Reilly-type tactics to this show which, up to now, was always calm, lucid and intelligent.
If you saw it, you saw Mr. Stephanopoulos totally lose control of his show, thanks to Ms. Cheney, and not just once but a few times.
It got so bad that, at the end of the show, Liz was still droning on with her views, talking over everyone si Gwen Ifill even tried to help give back the show and control to its host.
Liz Cheney should be asked to never return to this show unless or until she can discuss issues the old way--calmly, respectfully and like an adult.
If she's capapble of that.
At least the corporations are getting their money's worth.
Wednesday, March 25, 2009
Nice change of pace
Such was the case a week ago this past Saturday when he wrote of Americans, our diets and our exposure to corn, corn subsidies, corn syrup, meat in our diets and obesity in the United States. Even the title screamed agreement to me: "BAD HEALTH BUILT INTO OUR CORN-FED FOOD SYSTEM". (The capitalization was theirs).
He gave some terrific history about us, I think. For instance, he quotes Michael Pollan (no pun intended), author of The Omnivore's Dilemma and in Defense of Food. Mr. Pollan, he writes, "says that after World War II, the government had a surplus of ammonium nitrate, an ingredient of explosives--and fertilizer. Furthermore, pesticides could be made from ingredients of poison gases. Since 1945, the food supply has increased fster than America's population--faster even than Americans can increase their feasting."
Seriously, fascinating stuff.
People either don't know why we're so dang fat or they wonder why we are. The fact is, it has a great deal to do with farms, farming and corporations.
President Eisenhower warned us, for sure.
More:
--Did you know three in five Americans are overweight?
--one in five os us are out and out obese?
"Dureing World War II, when meat, dairy products and sugar were scarce, heart disease plummeted. It rebounded when ratioinng ended."
That's pretty incdredible right there.
"When you adjust for age...rates of chronic diseases like cancer and type 2 diabetes are considerably higher today than they were in 1900."
Yow. That's pretty indicting stuff.
My sister has been claiming for years, along with others, that if we ate better and smarter, we wouldn't have to pay millions and billions of dollars to treat and try to cure cancer. She's not alone, by a long shot. There are medical people who have been claiming this for years, too. It seems the data makes this clear and not really debatable, doesn't it?
Still more from Mr. Will's column: "Four of the top causes of American deaths--coronary heart disease, diabetes, stroke and cancer--'have well-established links' to diet, particularly through the superabundance of cheap calories of sugar and fat,' Pollan says."
So why put this down now?
First, because Mr. Will wrote of it just this past week.
Second, to spread the information.
And third and finally, because I am, just now going to board a cruise ship out of Miami and if I've heard anything about cruising, it's that there is mass quantities of food, all over the ship, virtually non-stop.
This gives me more desire to tone it all down, in the first place, and maybe evaluate the consumption, casually, while I'm enjoying myself.
Bon appetit'.
Tuesday, March 10, 2009
What needs to happen instead
I stand by that.
But more than all that, what really needs to happen is that, as David Brooks said Sunday morning on "This Week with George Stephanopoulis" on ABC, "The house is burning down around us."
It's all great that President Obama is tackling our other big problems, sure. Tackle health care. Tackle relations with the Soviet Union, the Taliban, Iran and the rest of the world.
But not right now.
Above all, get a handle on our economy. It is THE big problem, above all others, that needs to be addressed.
Fortunately, everyone agrees on this.
But that's not, it seems, what is coming out of the White House, to date.
I think this is going to change. The President and his staff and administration are all bright people.
I'm not just being trusting here. I'm not simply being naive.
The people running the country are opportunists and the kind of people that jumps on the biggest problems that would run them down otherwise.
But this needs to happen sooner--like this week--rather than later. The need to get on top of and pay attention to the economy, right now, above all other and as soon as possible.
Wednesday, January 21, 2009
Great Expectations (?)
And my answer is, yes--unequivocally, absolutely yes.
And here's why:
The conservative writer David Brooks, on PBS evening news last week, said he thought Obama was "non-partisan", in his words.
From a Conservative Republican, that's pretty extraordinary, for starters.
But more than that--much more--is that it seems that this new President is going to be, apparently and hopefully, a statesman, of all things.
We haven't seen one of those for a long time.
You may have already heard that the President-elect had dinner last week with a few very conservative columnists like William Kristol, for heavens sake, at George Will's home.
That's already very nearly unbelievable.
Can you remember the last time such a thing happened? I know I can't.
Another quote from last Friday evening's newscast was that Mr. Brooks found Mr. Obama to be much less of an "ideologue" and this, too, is so very welcome and now foreign to our politicians and politics.
It's generally agreed that the last 16 years have been tremendously ideological and divisive.
Far from being a "uniter", as President Bush promised he would be, years ago, he and his administration were loaded with ideologues and ideology, to the point of out-and-out dogma.
Right-wing, conservative, business-serving dogma and it's been very divisive and negative for the country.
When Republican Presidential administrations and campaigns started, years ago, clearing and denying attendees at what were supposed to be public speeches and presentations, so they could get audiences that were purely and completely acceptable to them and their ideas and directions, I was surprised--almost shocked--and disappointed, knowing we were going down a bad path.
I think President-elect Obama, as President, is going to bring statemanship, wisdom, calmness and intelligence back to the Presidency and so, the whole country.
Will Democrats and liberals get everything they want, always, from this new President?
No, certainly not. I'll say that right up front.
Barack Obama isn't perfect--he doesn't "walk on water", by any means.
But he's going to be what we need in this country, especially now, when we need to recover from the legal, internal and external, constitutional and financial issues, problems and messes we have now, due to the last 8 years of mismanagement, ineptitude and travesties.
This really is a new day.
A very welcome new day.




