Showing posts with label corporations. Show all posts
Showing posts with label corporations. Show all posts
Monday, March 15, 2021
Simple, Intelligent Things We Need to do on Taxes
Republicans are frequently concerned about deficits and deficit spending. At least they are when there is a Democratic Party President like now. Herwith, 3 easy and intelligent things we could do to help solve this problem.
--Raise the corporate tax rate so they pay the same as small businesses.
--Raise the tax rate on the rich so they pay the same as the middle-class.
--Remove loopholes and increase enforcement.
--Dan Price @DanPriceSeattle
Labels:
corporate America,
corporate tax rate,
corporations,
Dan Price,
deficit spending,
deficits,
fairness,
IRS,
Rich v Poor,
small business,
tax enforcement,
tax loopholes,
wealth gap,
wealth inequality
Tuesday, March 2, 2021
Thursday, February 4, 2021
Quote of the Day -- On the Rich and Poor
Robert Reich @RBReich
I will never accept a system that enables billionaires to add $1,100,000,000,000 to their wealth during a pandemic but doesn’t raise the $7.25 minimum wage for over a decade.
Tax the rich. Raise the wage. Now.
Tuesday, June 23, 2020
International, Killing Pandemic? The Rich Are Getting Richer
Important article more Americans need to see and read, from Forbes.
"Since the start of the pandemic, collective U.S. billionaire wealth has surged by more than $584 billion, while $6.5 trillion in household wealth has disappeared. That's according to an Institute for Policy Studies and Americans for Tax Fairness analysis published on Friday which stated that the U.S. billionaire class saw its wealth climb 20% between March 18 and June 17 with 29 new billionaires added to the total. Using Forbes data, the analysis found that the total net worth of the 643 U.S. billionaires climbed from $2.9 trillion to $3.5 trillion. During the same period, 45.5 million Americans filed for unemployment."
But tax the wealthy at a higher rate?

Fuggedaboudit!
Thanks, Mr. President!
Thanks Republicans!
Sunday, May 3, 2020
If We Can But Learn From All This... And Then Change
A friend sent me this yesterday. Wonderful video.
Here's hoping.
Sunday, June 2, 2019
Sprint, and Their Proposed Merger, Take a Hit Today
The Sprint company and the idea of its merger with T-Mobile takes a hit today in the New York Times.
Stop Creating Corporate Goliaths
A little of what they have to say.
Letting T-Mobile merge with Sprint would hurt consumers, workers and the economy
T-Mobile wooed customers by offering service plans with no long-term commitments, and by paying to free those customers from their old service plans. Rolling your unused data and minutes into the next month? T-Mobile did that, and AT&T and Verizon had no choice but to follow. More recently, T-Mobile vowed to match any discounts offered by competitors.
The fierce competition, and the march of technology, has rapidly reduced the cost of mobile phone service. Since 2009, the average cost of mobile service has fallen by roughly 28 percent, according to the Labor Department’s calculations. In 2017, at the peak of the mobile phone price wars, the Federal Reserve said prices were falling fast enough to meaningfully reduce inflation across the entire American economy.
That’s the beauty of competition. It’s been good for T-Mobile, too. Over the past five years, the company has added more subscribers than its larger rivals.
Now T-Mobile, the nation’s third-largest wireless company, wants to merge with Sprint, the No. 4 wireless carrier in the United States. The combined company would be in the same weight class as the two largest, AT&T and Verizon, with the three companies each controlling roughly a third of the market. Mr. Legere, who scorned the big guys, now wants to be one of them.
The Justice Department’s antitrust division staff has recommended that the federal government go to court to block the merger. That is good advice.
The proposed merger would harm American consumers. It would reduce the choice of service plans, and, over time, it is likely to result in higher prices and less innovation. It would also harm workers in the mobile phone industry, reducing competition for their labor. And it would increase the political power of the combined corporation...
On the one hand, this is coming from none other than The New York Times so it's going to carry some weight. It's certainly going to be on everyone's "radar", so to speak.
On the other hand, boys will be boys and money buys all, especially in our current national government. This may be a conversation for a while--a few days?--but when all is said and done, the FCC and this administration will do what they will, customers and nation be damned.
Look for the Sprint-T-Mobile merger to go through. We hope not but these things usually don't go for the people.
But thanks, anyway, New York Times, for trying.
Labels:
anti-trust,
cell phones,
consumer protection,
corporations,
editorial,
Facebook,
FCC,
Federal Communication Commission,
Labor Department,
merger,
mergers,
New York Times,
Op/ed,
opinion,
Sprint,
T-Mobile
Wednesday, March 14, 2018
Saturday, February 10, 2018
The Only Way We'll Stop Polluting the Planet
I've worked at a couple huge, national corporations and noticed a continuing, repeated thread running through them.
Corporations and all the employees that work for them throw away and waste a great deal of plastics and papers and cardboard and aluminum cans and glass.
Corporations, with all those people, create and then throw away all these materials.
And they do it daily. Weekly. Month after month. Year after year.
And they have no desire nor motivation to reduce the amount of waste and wastes and what ends up as pollution, landfill. It's what gets us these results:

Plastic Garbage Patch Bigger
Than Mexico Found in Pacific
'Plastic in All Sizes' Found Everywhere
in Once Pristine European Arctic
Nasa animation shows how ‘garbage islands’ have taken over the seas in the last 35 years
Corporations are all about profit and profits, of course. Because of that, they're also about cutting costs. They're about cutting costs at all costs. Recycling requires commitment. It requires spending. Those are costs they don't want to assume or commit to.
So let's face it. The only way we, as a nation and planet, can get them to start recycling and at least reduce, if not end polluting will be for government and governments, state by state and nation by nation, to require them to do so, to start and keep recycling.
Think about the waste.
Think about how much paper and plastic alone each McDonald's restaurant throws out. Daily. Then think of the entire company.
AT&T
GE
Alcoa
Dupont
Bayer
The list goes on. Company after company. All over the nation, continent and world.
We must do this. We must require this. We have to call them out on this. They won't do it on their own.
An upside to all this, besides that we'll clean up our planet is that it will also create jobs. Those are two huge wins for humanity and the planet.
The thing is, it must come from us, from the people.
Links:
And it's not just the oceans, of course.
Labels:
aluminum,
cardboard,
corporate pollution,
corporations,
Ecowatch,
Facebook,
glass,
government,
landfills,
National Geographic,
Pacific Ocean,
paper,
plastics,
pollution,
recycling,
regulations,
The Daily Mail
Saturday, December 10, 2016
An Insightful Article, Dealing With Kansas City's Own Now-Gone Twinkies Plant
Remember Kansas City's Twinkies plant? The Hostess plant?
Sure you do.
And remember how, just before it closed and was sold off, the owners said it wasn't profitable because of the Unions and because of the workers' demands?
Yeah, well, bullshit.
How the Twinkie Made the Superrich
Even Richer
Here's your "class warfare" for you, folks. And I can tell you, the "upper class" is winning.
Again.
Some more.
If anyone, anyone is in the middle- or lower-class and against Unions, they're at least mistaken. Wildly mistaken.
If not stupid.
Thursday, January 14, 2016
A Call For Corporate Taxation and a Required National Wage
An economist warns that "advances in technology and automation are set to wipe out up to half of all jobs in the developed world."

RBS Warns: Sell Everything
A small bit from the article:
Also reason why all corporations should pay a minimum tax and not be able to deduct their way out of paying any taxes or, worse, get a rebate or, worse yet, offshore profits or be able to.
Another good, related article:
The current rout in oil prices has obvious implications for the giant oil firms and all the ancillary businesses — equipment suppliers, drill-rig operators, shipping companies, caterers, and so on — that depend on them for their existence. It also threatens a profound shift in the geopolitical fortunes of the major energy-producing countries. Many of them, including Nigeria, Saudi Arabia, Russia, and Venezuela, are already experiencing economic and political turmoil as a result. (Think of this, for instance, as a boon for the terrorist group Boko Haram as Nigeria shudders under the weight of those falling prices.) The longer such price levels persist, the more devastating the consequences are likely to be.
If anything like or near these "worst case scenarios" take place, governments and corporations the world over may HAVE to give and require a minimum payout to their citizens, just to keep the economic world spinning.
Here's a perfect example and it's from a current article.
If corporations and nations don't give a minimum payout to their citizens, who will be able to buy the products that keep this whole merry go round turning?
The current rout in oil prices has obvious implications for the giant oil firms and all the ancillary businesses — equipment suppliers, drill-rig operators, shipping companies, caterers, and so on — that depend on them for their existence. It also threatens a profound shift in the geopolitical fortunes of the major energy-producing countries. Many of them, including Nigeria, Saudi Arabia, Russia, and Venezuela, are already experiencing economic and political turmoil as a result. (Think of this, for instance, as a boon for the terrorist group Boko Haram as Nigeria shudders under the weight of those falling prices.) The longer such price levels persist, the more devastating the consequences are likely to be.
If anything like or near these "worst case scenarios" take place, governments and corporations the world over may HAVE to give and require a minimum payout to their citizens, just to keep the economic world spinning.
Here's a perfect example and it's from a current article.
Chinese factory replaces 90% of humans
with robots
A nation of more than 1.4 billion people and the companies, the corporations replaced, as the headline shows, the vast majority of the employees with machines.
If corporations and nations don't give a minimum payout to their citizens, who will be able to buy the products that keep this whole merry go round turning?
Monday, August 10, 2015
Quote of the Day -- On Our Future
With corporations making record profits yet hiring fewer and fewer people and in lots of cases, transitioning to robots and machines to do the work, this becomes more and more not just possible but important.
Monday, April 13, 2015
Quote of the Day -- Thomas Jefferson
Happy birthday, Mr. President, born this day, 1743.

I hope we shall crush in its birth the aristocracy of our monied corporations which dare already to challenge our government to a trial by strength, and bid defiance to the laws of our country.
We can't say we weren't warned. And we risk failure by not acting.
Wednesday, October 29, 2014
Sunday, October 19, 2014
Abraham Lincoln: On Corporations
“I see in the near future a crisis approaching that unnerves me and causes me to tremble for the safety of my country. . . . corporations have been enthroned and an era of corruption in high places will follow, and the money power of the country will endeavor to prolong its reign by working upon the prejudices of the people until all wealth is aggregated in a few hands and the Republic is destroyed.”
-President Abraham Lincoln, Nov. 21, 1864 (letter to Col. William F. Elkins)
Saturday, August 30, 2014
Thursday, May 15, 2014
America, don't let these happen
There are two purchases that have been proposed, that are pending, that absolutely, without question, should not happen and that will only end up hurting you, hurting us, hurting America. These two purchases will do nothing but make extremely large, already-powerful companies even larger and do nothing but hurt competition here in the country and hurt you and me, hurt our pocketbooks. They are:
There is already far too little competition for internet and TV services. These purchases, if allowed to occur, will shrink it down even further.
The only winners are the large corporations and the executives at them.
Fight these America.
If you know what's good for you.
For more information, read this:
Big Telecom: Proposed Mergers Will Test Companies' Relationships in Washington
Monday, March 31, 2014
Quote of the day -- on corporations, America, government and greed

Wednesday, March 19, 2014
Monday, January 13, 2014
From the "Things We Allow Corporations to Get Away With" file
Perhaps you saw some of these headlines in the last few days?
West Virginians to be without water for days because of chemical spill
Which brings up this thought I saw yesterday on Facebook:
"If a foreign terrorist group poisoned the water of an entire region in the U.S. we'd likely be going into another war, but since it's just an improperly regulated company, well, that's just the cost of doing business."
--From a post on Http://Fb.com/TheMarmelPage
Additional link: The Steve Marmel Page
Saturday, January 11, 2014
Quote of the day--on America
Labels:
air pollution,
Brainy Quote,
BrainyQuote.com,
capitalism,
corporations,
Earth,
Facebook,
greed,
Native Americans,
nature,
pollution,
quote,
quote of the day,
quotes,
rich vs. poor,
water pollution
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)









