And, shock of shocks, it's from yet another Right Wing, overly-religious Republican:
Late last month, Rick Brattin, a Republican state representative in Missouri, introduced a bill that would require that intelligent design and "destiny" get the same educational treatment and textbook space in Missouri schools as the theory of evolution. Brattin insists that his bill has nothing to do with religion—it's all in the name of science.
"I'm a science enthusiast...I'm a huge science buff," Brattin tells The Riverfront Times. "This [bill] is about testable data in today's world." But Eric Meikle, education project director at the National Center for Science Education, disagrees. "This bill is very idiosyncratic and strange," he tells Mother Jones. "And there is simply not scientific evidence for intelligence design."
Wait, it gets worse:
HB 291, the "Missouri Standard Science Act," redefines a few things you thought you already knew about science. For example, a "hypothesis" is redefined as something that reflects a "minority of scientific opinion and is "philosophically unpopular." A scientific theory is "an inferred explanation...whose components are data, logic and faith-based philosophy." And "destiny" is not something that $5 fortune tellers believe in; Instead, it's "the events and processes that define the future of the universe, galaxies, stars, our solar system, earth, plant life, animal life, and the human race."
The bill requires that Missouri elementary and secondary schools—and even introductory science classes in public universities—give equal textbook space to both evolution and intelligent design (any other "theories of origin" are allowed to be taught as well, so pick your favorite creation myth—I'm partial to the Russian raven spirit.) "I can't imagine any mainstream textbook publisher would comply with this," Meikle says. "The material doesn't exist."
And he isn't done there, either:
The bill also establishes a nine-person committee (who must work for free) responsible for developing ad-hoc textbook material until appropriate textbook material is found.
Mr. Brattin goes on to claim:
...that there are "numerous college professors within biology, school science teachers" who are "banned from the science community" because they want to teach other theories of origin. The National Center for Science Education's Meikle agrees—the bill really could "open the door for teachers who are opposed to evolution to bring in creationist materials." That's why his group is "hoping it doesn't pass."
If this is so, if there are "numerous college professors..." who are "banned from the science community" because they want to teach other theories of origin besides evolution and anything and everything based only on science, I think it's incumbent upon Rep. Brattin to name them for us. That'd no doubt be a hoot.
Someone should make a movie on Mr. Brattin. They could name it "Pretty Boy Goes to Washington."
No, wait, "...Goes to Jefferson City."
That's it--"Right Wing, Christian, Simpleton Pretty Boy Goes to Jefferson City."
I'm sure his parents are so proud.
Honestly, the news out of Right Wing, Republican Missouri and Kansas state houses lately is just repeatedly, downright embarrassing.
Link: http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2013/02/intelligent-design-missouri-evolution
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment