Blog Catalog

Showing posts with label Knight-Ridder Media. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Knight-Ridder Media. Show all posts

Wednesday, August 6, 2014

How We've Nearly Destroyed Our Media In the US


We did it to ourselves.

Or, rather, as so many bad things done in and to our country in the past 30 years, at least, the Republicans did it to us:


Twenty-seven years ago this month, the Reagan administration eliminated the Fairness Doctrine, thus allowing American commercial talk-radio stations licensed over our public airwaves, to become shamelessly slanted towards the radical right. Just under a year later, Rush Limbaugh's radio program, originally based out of Sacramento, California, was syndicated nationally --- a falsehood factory that distributed its defective products to millions of customers.

Limbaugh was widely credited with ginning up the faux-outrage towards President Clinton that brought about the GOP's House and Senate victories in the 1994 midterms --- victories that ultimately led to the blocking of further gun-safety reforms, as (MSNBC's Steve) Kornacki noted. To this day, Limbaugh and his talk-radio imitators demonize any effort to keep Americans from dying prematurely from gun violence, and rhetorically assault politicians who advocate tough gun-safety measures.

Ever since that fateful month, we've had ugly, extremist reports, replete with subtle, no so subtle and blatant lies, all represented as "media" reports, "news", if you will.  It's yet one more reason the American populace is so polarized. When you have the likes of, yes, Rush "Porkulus" Limbaugh and Glenn Beck and Bill O'Really, Ann "I'll Say Anything" Coulter and others, spewing out extremely emotional, one-sided stories, half-truths, untruths and, again, blatant lies, frequently with vitriol and/or anger or even tears, what result can we expect but that some people pick up those pieces and run with them, out here in the world?


And if someone eventually tries to reintroduce it to our government and nation--as they ought--it will be said it prohibits free speech and curbs First Amendment Rights.

Nonsense.

It merely requires, for every viewpoint or side taken, for an opposing view to be given, that's all. (See the link below for a fuller definition and description of the policy).

As we are today, this is not a good way to get good, important, solid, non-biased information out to the nation. This is no way to run media. It's no way to inform a populace.

As it is, it's no way to run a nation.

It won't happen easily, it won't happen without a fight but we need the Fairness Doctrine back.

We need it badly and we need it as soon as possible.

Here's hoping.

Friday, March 8, 2013

How NOT to have a newspaper go digital and into the future


Regarding The Kansas City Star and all regional newspapers:

The battle of New Orleans : Columbia Journalism Review

 
A good and important read.

It tells of the end of the Times-Picayune newspaper and its reporters.

It made me rather nauseous to read it.

It makes me fear for our future.

Monday, January 21, 2013

The New York Times, shining the way for our Star


There is a fascinating, and insightful article in The New York Times Sunday about the transition for and of that old, venerable paper into the news, information and entertainment source it will hopefully, into the future.



Fortunately, The Times, to date, understands as so few newspaper groups do, that in order to be a vital relevant and important source for news, information, arts and entertainment for its readers and subscribers, you need excellent, experienced reporters and writers.

Fortunately, too, for more local newspapers (like the Star), is that they don't need to do the more national and international reporting The Times does.

What people in the newspaper industry need to know and develop is that the only way they can survive is by transforming what they are on paper to an online version and that will require being multi-media source and experience that covers their cities and metropolitan area and all the counties involved and even the region the paper serves.

By doing this, by transitioning to an online source and by including writing and photography and video and music, everything, a "newspaper" will be able to survive.

But the people doing these papers now, need to understand that.

If they don't, if they don't understand and do that and as soon as possible, they will, quite likely, die.

And until they do, until they realize this, the end of that newspaper will likely be far sooner than they think.

Monday, June 6, 2011

Still a cheap thrill

I know this is a funny thing and only a small number of people outside of The Kansas City Star staff would get this but I still get a kind of cheap thrill in seeing our own, former Kansas City editor of the Star and Kansas City resident Arthur Brisbane as now public editor of  The New York Times.
I saw a column of his a couple weeks ago and had to kind of pinch myself, figuratively speaking, in seeing his name in their paper.  

Considering I'm not a media person, really, but just a news junkie, I know it's nerdy but I'm good with that. It's still kind of cool.  He was (is?) one of us.

Have a great week, y'all. 

Tuesday, May 3, 2011

A problem of The Star's they make themselves

One of The Kansas City Star's biggest problems was blatantly obvious today.  I got a copy to read over lunch.

Another mistake, on my part.

The front page of the paper?

Four-fifths of it was on Osama bin Laden.  The last one-fifth was on local issues.

The 2nd section of the paper? 

In their own words:  "Killing Osama bin Laden:  A special 8-page section on the hunt, the death and the consequences"

Page A2?  The 2nd page in the paper?  One-half on national news and one-half advertising.

A3?  Same here.

Page A4 finally is a page of local news.  Finally.

A5?  A full-page ad.

It goes on like that.

The Sports section is the Sports section, they get what they want and need.

The "entertainment" section?  "FYI"?  There's a huge picture and story on the New Orleans Jazz and Heritage Festival and then Aaron Barnhart covers the White House Correspondent's Dinner.

My points?

The end result is that Kansas City Star is not a local paper.

The one thing they should do BETTER THAN ANYONE, ANYWHERE, is to cover local stories, local people and local color.

If they don't do that, who will?  The local TV news stations?

We all know that's at least rare.  (See one good exception below).

So on page C4 in the Business section of the paper today is an article--yes, it's finally local--telling of this same Star newspaper laying off yet more staff.

Granted, the newspaper business is dying, sure.

And they've laid off a great deal of reporters, before this latest layoff.

But y'all sure aren't doing yourselves any favor down there at the Star's offices copying and pasting national stories and then expecting us to buy the rag.

The photographer, Eric Bowers, pointed this out on his Facebook page recently:

I reiterate how useless local news stations can be. There was a large demonstration on the Plaza by the Syrian and Arab American community about some slaughtering going on in Syria by the tyrants there and the news stations didn't even send a truck - they're too busy talking about dumb crap like cats stuck in trees in the suburbs to do any actual spreading of world information based on how it relates locally.


And who's covering a scandal up in Parkville right now?  Reporter Russ Ptacek on NBC "Action News".

It sure wasn't The Star.

Link:  http://www.kansascity.com/
http://blog.ericbowersphoto.com/2011/05/protest-in-kansas-city-against-syrias-bashar-al-assad/
https://www.facebook.com/home.php?ref=hpskip#!/video/video.php?v=10150579645520582&comments

Saturday, November 6, 2010

Articles they might be reading over at the Star?

Why The Pay-To-Read Model Won't Work For Newspapers On The Web


Oh, and if that's not enough, here's another:


Local Media Disrupted: How TV, Radio and Newspapers Could Get Screwed

This second one should be enough to give Tony at TKC shivers of excitement.  And heads up--this second one ends with a good deal of forward-thinking but simple, intelligent information--and good humor, to boot.

The bad news?  

It looks increasingly like we will lose our newspapers--and at a much faster speed than we thought.

The good news?

We should have far fewer trees cut down.If you're interested, links are in succession, below.



Have a terrfic weekend, y'all.



Link:  http://www.businessinsider.com/why-the-pay-to-read-model-wont-work-for-newspapers-on-the-web-2010-11

http://www.businessinsider.com/local-media-disrupted-2010-10