Blog Catalog

Showing posts with label Julian Assange. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Julian Assange. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 8, 2012

Bradley Manning up for Nobel Peace Prize?

This is big news. Army Private Bradley Manning, originally "arrested in Iraq on suspicion of having passed restricted material to the website Wikileaks"...and then "charged with a dozen crimes from transferring classified data into his personal computer to aiding the enemy" has been nominated to receive the Nobel Peace Prize. THAT'S going to upset a lot of people. At the same time, it will make a lot of others happy, too, the ones fighting for his release. Last note: one thing I find additionally very interesting about this is that Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul is for freeing Mr. Manning. Links: http://goodmenproject.com/good-feed-blog/hero-or-traitor/; http://www.BradleyManning.org

Thursday, October 20, 2011

In case you don't know or can't tell--because really, it's not that great a picture on the left--that's Julian Assange of "Wikileaks" on the left.

Tuesday, October 4, 2011

Andy Rooney? And Wikileaks?

Andy Rooney, of CBS News' famous "60 Minutes" news program retired, of sorts, Sunday evening as I think so many people know so he gave a bit of a goodbye talk. In it, he said "I believe that if all the truth in the world, it would be a better place to live." Now I ask you, does that not sound like something Wikileaks founder Julian Assange would say or has already said? As an example: “The aim of Wikileaks is to achieve just reform around the world and do it through the mechanism of transparency.” I would never have thought someone like Andy Rooney would sound even remotely like that. Links: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julian_Assange; http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/j/julian_assange.html; http://anitasnotebook.com/misc/julian-assange-from-wikileaks-quotes

Thursday, December 2, 2010

Julian Assange: Sinner or saint?

You know, really, this whole Julian Assange/Wikileaks case is pretty fascinating.

Most Americans likely don't know much of Wikileaks other than that they first released 90,000 files on the Afghanistan War earlier this year and then more recently, just released approximately 250,000 more files, of somewhat random material, all from our own government.

The fact is, if you go to the Wikipedia site for Wikileaks (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WikiLeaks), you can find they've really had a pretty good go, internationally, of exposing corruption and pollution and other topics, all over the globe.  They've, so far, had a pretty good run.

But this last release I spoke of above, with the 250,000 files, seems to be a bit of a low point for both Wikileaks and their founder, this Julian Assange.

The material they released didn't really seem to pin down any real or specific "sins" of the US--or any other country.  It all seemed just a hodge-podge of information, released because they could.  A big release for release sake.  So what if someone said Germany's Angela Merkel isn't "creative"?  Who cares?  It's all about blown over, even now.

What starts to get fascinating, though, is the charges out of Sweden just now for Mr. Assange.  This is the second time for it but he's finally being formally charged, this time with two charges of sexual misconduct.


Interpol issued a high alert for Assange on Wednesday at the request of Sweden.  Assange has maintained his innocence and called the charges in Sweden a smear campaign.

You have to wonder if Sweden is correct and he really did these wrong things or if he just pissed off way too many people, in way too high positions and now it's all going to come down on him.

It's getting curioser and curioser.

It should be even more fascinating to see this all unfold.

Link:  http://www.cnn.com/2010/LIVING/12/01/assange.profile/index.html?eref=rss_topstories&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed:+rss/cnn_topstories+(RSS:+Top+Stories)

Sunday, November 28, 2010

On Wikileaks now

Some thoughts on the latest Wikileaks release of documents.

First, you can pretty much count on this being in the top 5 news items the rest of this week, I think, given what so far has been learned in the documents and the fact that there were so many released this time.

Second, it seems difficult to see either what was gained by this release or, in the bigger picture, just what Wikileaks is/was trying to accomplish.

In the recent past, since their inception, Wikileaks has done some good, it seems:

WikiLeaks has won a number of awards, including the 2008 Economist magazine New Media Award.[5] In June 2009, WikiLeaks and Julian Assange won Amnesty International's UK Media Award (in the category "New Media") for the 2008 publication of "Kenya: The Cry of Blood – Extra Judicial Killings and Disappearances",[6] a report by the Kenya National Commission on Human Rights about police killings in Kenya.[7] In May 2010, the New York Daily News listed WikiLeaks first in a ranking of "websites that could totally change the news".[8]
In April 2010, WikiLeaks posted video from a 2007 incident in which Iraqi civilians were killed by U.S. forces, on a website called Collateral Murder. In July of the same year, WikiLeaks released Afghan War Diary, a compilation of more than 76,900 documents about the War in Afghanistan not previously available for public review.[9] In October the group released a package of almost 400,000 documents called the Iraq War Logs in coordination with major commercial media organisations.

In the previous release of documents, I applauded them because I thought it could--possibly, hopefully--contribute to the ending of our war in Afghanistan.  I likened them and their work to Daniel Ellsberg and his "Pentagon Papers."  I think Senator John Kerry (D-MA) may be correct when he said "This is not an academic exercise about freedom of information and it is not akin to the release of the Pentagon Papers, which involved an analysis aimed at saving American lives and exposing government deception."

Also, if you go to the Wikipedia link below, you can see they've exposed a good deal of corruption and polluting, etc., that wouldn't have been exposed otherwise, it seems.
 
But this latest release seems to be a "release for release sake" or just because they can and because they are Wikileaks.  It's difficult, so far, to see or hear anything good for the country or world that was achieved by releasing these documents.  Some of the information released deals with seemingly trivial but negative descriptions of world leaders.  
 
You know what?  While trivial and even negative, they may be accurate and important in efforts to understand a "bigger picture" and where another, foreign country and its leaders are headed.
 
These latest documents show that the US urged spying on the UN and that, supposedly, our diplomats in foreign countries have, in fact, been directed to spy on their host country.   They tell, reputedly of Saudi Arabia urging us--the US--to attack Iran.  And that's just a small bit of the information that has come out so far.  A great deal more will be learned and released in days to come.
 
It just seems, so far, at this early stage, that Julian Assange and his Wikileaks group may have gone either a big step too far or a big step in a wrong direction.  It's difficult to see how this release can or will help the US or the world to negotiate and work with one another to overcome our many and large problems.
 
Stay tuned. 
 
While fascinating, I think this release is already unfortunate, at least, and maybe very damaging, at worst. 
 
Let's hope not.  Let's hope some great good can come out of this because, the truth is, they're already out and there's no going back now.
 
Links:  http://www.cnn.com/2010/US/11/28/wikileaks.documents.published/index.html?eref=rss_topstories&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+rss%2Fcnn_topstories+%28RSS%3A+Top+Stories%29
http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2010/11/28-3
http://www.alternet.org/world/149000/wikileaks_docs_released:_us_urged_spying_on_un,_arab_leaders_secretly_called_for_strike_against_iran?utm_source=feedblitz&utm_medium=FeedBlitzRss&utm_campaign=alternet
http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2010-11-28/wikileaks-documents-chinas-google-hack-un-spying-more-secrets/

Monday, July 26, 2010

The "Pentagon Papers" vs. the "Afghanistan Papers" at Wikileaks

Propublica does a terrific job of showing both the similarities and differences between the "Pentagon Papers" release by Daniel Ellsberg some 40 years ago and the Wikileaks release of 92,000 classified documents this week (see my earlier entry on this, from this weekend): http://www.propublica.org/blog/item/sheehan-interview. According to Wikeleaks' founder, Julian Assange, there are more documents to come out on this, too. Stay tuned, campers.