I have to say, I think the Mayor has this one right.
You'll have to see the Star this morning (Pg. A4) and its article about the mayor saying that $2 million of the city's money should no longer go to the Truman Sports Complex.
Yeah. You bet. He is right. (for once?).
And for a lot of good reasons:
First, it's not contractual. This was never set in stone anywhere and we've been doing it just to be "nice guys."
But you know what? This is in the midst of the worst recession in 80 years, since the Great Depression. Times are difficult, to say the least, and that's the 2nd reason.
Third, we really could use that money on our infrastructure like roads and bridges and sewers and who knows what all. We just hope the mayor can keep his mouth shut the rest of the time he's in office so it doesn't go to settle more lawsuits against him. (Seriously, have you ever known a Mayor to have had more public lawsuits against him because he's mayor? I can't think of any. I wonder what this clown has cost us so far. Good question. Note to self: possible additional blog entry).
Fourth and finally, both the Chiefs and Royals have taken millions and millions of dollars in taxes from the citizens of Jackson County, Kansas City (and for that matter, from Johnson County and Kansas), even though they are extremely profitable monopoly businesses. They'd have a lot of chutzpah complaining about missing this $2million. (Not that they won't complain about it, it wouldn't be surprising).
Now let's hope that, if they go through with this, the city really does spend the $2 million on street repair.
Coincidentally, there's a campaign being put on right now by the area's Heavy Construction Association to the tune of $110,000 (and possibly more) that starts soon and goes for the next year.
It seems the big boys are starting this "Stop the Nonsense" PR campaing "to pressure the" city "council to spend more general fund money for capital maintenance projects such as roads and bridges."
It seems the budget for these projects is down $7 million and they want it back, at minimum.
Hmmmm. Isn't that what the Mayor said he would do in his campaign for the job he has, make us "The City that Works"?
"An early draft of the group's campaign...shows plans for a broad-based critique of the mayor and council on radio, in newspaper ads, billboards and direct mail to residents."
The mayor will most assuredly bear the brunt of this negative campaign, too. To criticize "the council" is too vague. I'll bet most Kansas Citians can't even name one council member.
So here's one more group aligned against the mayor and our current local government.
It would be nice if those folks would wake up down there and give us the kind of efficient government the mayor promised and that we should, rightly, have, instead of things like Ed Ford's boneheaded idea of expanding the city North with his Tomahawke Ridge boondoggle.
Here's hoping.
Have a great weekend, y'all.
Showing posts with label Ed Ford. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ed Ford. Show all posts
Friday, February 12, 2010
Saturday, February 6, 2010
Note to Ed Ford and the City Council of Kansas City, Missouri
I don't think I'm being presumptuous here by pretending to, singlehandedly, speak for the citizens of the entire city but I think I'm safe in sending you this following note:
After the City Council's Planning and Zoning Committee passed a preliminary resolution this week this week in favor of the new Tomahawke Ridge housing community, North of the city, we, the citizens of Kansas City, whom you are supposed to represent, want you to know
WE DO NOT WANT THE TOMAHAWKE RIDGE DEVELOPMENT TO GO FORWARD.
And we don't want it for the following reasons, at minimum:
--It contributes to sprawl;
--It's too far from the city;
--It weakens the city's core further;
--It is 25 miles from the city's core;
--It will be difficult, at best, to give it fire protection;
--Our own Fire Department doesn't recommend it;
--The City Planning Department doesn't recommend it;
--The City can't even clear our streets now, with what we've got, let alone if we add 300+ more homes;
--The City can't even tend to our own street maintenance now, with what we've got, let alone by adding all these more miles of streets;
--The City can't even tend to our sewage system now, with what we've got, let alone by adding all this much more sewers, drains and pipes.
And that's just for starters.
We don't want it.
It isn't prudent, to use an old phrase from Saturday Night Live.
But we're serious.
And we mean it.
Thank you,
The citizens of Kansas City, Missouri
After the City Council's Planning and Zoning Committee passed a preliminary resolution this week this week in favor of the new Tomahawke Ridge housing community, North of the city, we, the citizens of Kansas City, whom you are supposed to represent, want you to know
WE DO NOT WANT THE TOMAHAWKE RIDGE DEVELOPMENT TO GO FORWARD.
And we don't want it for the following reasons, at minimum:
--It contributes to sprawl;
--It's too far from the city;
--It weakens the city's core further;
--It is 25 miles from the city's core;
--It will be difficult, at best, to give it fire protection;
--Our own Fire Department doesn't recommend it;
--The City Planning Department doesn't recommend it;
--The City can't even clear our streets now, with what we've got, let alone if we add 300+ more homes;
--The City can't even tend to our own street maintenance now, with what we've got, let alone by adding all these more miles of streets;
--The City can't even tend to our sewage system now, with what we've got, let alone by adding all this much more sewers, drains and pipes.
And that's just for starters.
We don't want it.
It isn't prudent, to use an old phrase from Saturday Night Live.
But we're serious.
And we mean it.
Thank you,
The citizens of Kansas City, Missouri
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
