Yesterday, as I wrote here earlier, our not-so-illustrious Mayor Mark "the Funk" Funkhouser was on KCUR's "Central Standard" radio program. He told of what he did during his first tenure ("got our economic/financial house in order", paraphrased) and said what he would want to do in a second term if--God forbid--he were re-elected.
The Star points out today--very well--in an op/ed piece on the "E tax" mess we and St. Louis are in, that as soon as the vote on the Prop A/E-tax was done, St. Louis' mayor jumped all over it and said they were going to form a business/government alliance to defeat it.
Our own mayor?
To date, no word of coordination with anyone.
Instead, again, as the Star points out: "...Mayor Mark Funkhouser hasn't provided any real leadership to rally different groups behind the cause. Instead, he's feuded for months with the Greater Kansas City Chamber of Commerce, creating a deep schism with business leaders."
So typical of this mayor. Instead of working WITH people--nearly anyone--he virtually always fights them. I've said, time and again, I can't imagine who this mayor works WITH. It's him and Gloria against the world. And they seem to like it that way.
So since the mayor isn't leading on this, people from the chamber, the Civic Council of Greater Kansas City, the Greater Kansas City AFL-CIO, the International Association of Fire Fighters Local 42 and the Heavy Constructors Association of Greater Kansas City have all decided to come together, wisely, and fight this E-tax vote coming up.
Thank goodness someone's leading in town.
We sure aren't going to get it from Mayor Mark Funkhouser.
Link: http://www.kansascity.com/2010/12/06/2502435/the-stars-editorial-riding-to.html
Showing posts with label Heavy Contractors Association. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Heavy Contractors Association. Show all posts
Tuesday, December 7, 2010
Friday, February 12, 2010
Notes on a Mayor
I have to say, I think the Mayor has this one right.
You'll have to see the Star this morning (Pg. A4) and its article about the mayor saying that $2 million of the city's money should no longer go to the Truman Sports Complex.
Yeah. You bet. He is right. (for once?).
And for a lot of good reasons:
First, it's not contractual. This was never set in stone anywhere and we've been doing it just to be "nice guys."
But you know what? This is in the midst of the worst recession in 80 years, since the Great Depression. Times are difficult, to say the least, and that's the 2nd reason.
Third, we really could use that money on our infrastructure like roads and bridges and sewers and who knows what all. We just hope the mayor can keep his mouth shut the rest of the time he's in office so it doesn't go to settle more lawsuits against him. (Seriously, have you ever known a Mayor to have had more public lawsuits against him because he's mayor? I can't think of any. I wonder what this clown has cost us so far. Good question. Note to self: possible additional blog entry).
Fourth and finally, both the Chiefs and Royals have taken millions and millions of dollars in taxes from the citizens of Jackson County, Kansas City (and for that matter, from Johnson County and Kansas), even though they are extremely profitable monopoly businesses. They'd have a lot of chutzpah complaining about missing this $2million. (Not that they won't complain about it, it wouldn't be surprising).
Now let's hope that, if they go through with this, the city really does spend the $2 million on street repair.
Coincidentally, there's a campaign being put on right now by the area's Heavy Construction Association to the tune of $110,000 (and possibly more) that starts soon and goes for the next year.
It seems the big boys are starting this "Stop the Nonsense" PR campaing "to pressure the" city "council to spend more general fund money for capital maintenance projects such as roads and bridges."
It seems the budget for these projects is down $7 million and they want it back, at minimum.
Hmmmm. Isn't that what the Mayor said he would do in his campaign for the job he has, make us "The City that Works"?
"An early draft of the group's campaign...shows plans for a broad-based critique of the mayor and council on radio, in newspaper ads, billboards and direct mail to residents."
The mayor will most assuredly bear the brunt of this negative campaign, too. To criticize "the council" is too vague. I'll bet most Kansas Citians can't even name one council member.
So here's one more group aligned against the mayor and our current local government.
It would be nice if those folks would wake up down there and give us the kind of efficient government the mayor promised and that we should, rightly, have, instead of things like Ed Ford's boneheaded idea of expanding the city North with his Tomahawke Ridge boondoggle.
Here's hoping.
Have a great weekend, y'all.
You'll have to see the Star this morning (Pg. A4) and its article about the mayor saying that $2 million of the city's money should no longer go to the Truman Sports Complex.
Yeah. You bet. He is right. (for once?).
And for a lot of good reasons:
First, it's not contractual. This was never set in stone anywhere and we've been doing it just to be "nice guys."
But you know what? This is in the midst of the worst recession in 80 years, since the Great Depression. Times are difficult, to say the least, and that's the 2nd reason.
Third, we really could use that money on our infrastructure like roads and bridges and sewers and who knows what all. We just hope the mayor can keep his mouth shut the rest of the time he's in office so it doesn't go to settle more lawsuits against him. (Seriously, have you ever known a Mayor to have had more public lawsuits against him because he's mayor? I can't think of any. I wonder what this clown has cost us so far. Good question. Note to self: possible additional blog entry).
Fourth and finally, both the Chiefs and Royals have taken millions and millions of dollars in taxes from the citizens of Jackson County, Kansas City (and for that matter, from Johnson County and Kansas), even though they are extremely profitable monopoly businesses. They'd have a lot of chutzpah complaining about missing this $2million. (Not that they won't complain about it, it wouldn't be surprising).
Now let's hope that, if they go through with this, the city really does spend the $2 million on street repair.
Coincidentally, there's a campaign being put on right now by the area's Heavy Construction Association to the tune of $110,000 (and possibly more) that starts soon and goes for the next year.
It seems the big boys are starting this "Stop the Nonsense" PR campaing "to pressure the" city "council to spend more general fund money for capital maintenance projects such as roads and bridges."
It seems the budget for these projects is down $7 million and they want it back, at minimum.
Hmmmm. Isn't that what the Mayor said he would do in his campaign for the job he has, make us "The City that Works"?
"An early draft of the group's campaign...shows plans for a broad-based critique of the mayor and council on radio, in newspaper ads, billboards and direct mail to residents."
The mayor will most assuredly bear the brunt of this negative campaign, too. To criticize "the council" is too vague. I'll bet most Kansas Citians can't even name one council member.
So here's one more group aligned against the mayor and our current local government.
It would be nice if those folks would wake up down there and give us the kind of efficient government the mayor promised and that we should, rightly, have, instead of things like Ed Ford's boneheaded idea of expanding the city North with his Tomahawke Ridge boondoggle.
Here's hoping.
Have a great weekend, y'all.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
Posts
