There is an article out right now on the internet, at alternet.org, asking the question of whether or not it makes sense for California to switch to ethanol for fuel, instead of using so much oil.
Far from it.
Back in the 70's, when I was in college, my professor pointed out that it was insane--and he's right, think about it--to tie a country's food supply (corn, whatever) as an energy source.
Once you do, guess what happens?
Two things, really: 1) the price of that food crop goes up, at minimum, and people don't want that--hell, can't afford it and 2) if/when there is ever a drought--and there invariably are droughts, if we wait long enough, we know that--people starve.
Not go hungry.
People starve. As in no food.
Ethanol is insane.
Using corn to create fuel for cars is in no way a good, intelligent, useful answer.
Ironically, too, ethanol also doesn't solve our problems because you're still burning things--in this case corn and/or corn stalks--to create the energy so it's both polluting and adding to possible climate change. It also doesn't solve anything because the scientists have shown that ethanol doesn't put out as much energy as it takes to create it. Finally, if those 2 points aren't enough, if you haven't seen or read anything online, on TV or in a newspaper or magazine lately, we are running out of water, folks. Ethanol adds to that use of and reduction in water supplies.
Let me say one more time--the only thing that makes sense as a replacement for oil is solar power through photovoltaic cells.
It solves all the problems and answers all the questions.
It's nearly infinitely renewable (until the sun disappears), it's almost completely clean in that it doesn't pollute and doesn't emit carbon dioxide so it doesn't contribute to either pollution or climate change, we don't get it from the Middle East so it doesn't contribute to the insanity that is the Middle East war, lo these thousands of years and, finally, it stops the transfer of wealth from here--the US and the West--to that backwards, ignorant, mostly fundamentalist region of the world.
Ethanol is decidedly not the answer.
Solar power isn't perfect but it comes darned close.
Link to story:
http://www.alternet.org/environment/137578/will_california_say_no_to_ethanol/?cID=1195532#c1195532
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
It take more energy to produce ethanol than gasoline and mileage is less with ethanol. I agree with you that ethanol is not the solution to anything except higher crop prices for farmers, higher feed prices for beef suppliers and much higher use of fertilizer. Not at all a wise course.
Post a Comment