A "2nd Bill of Rights":
President Franklin Roosevelt, in 1944, for pity's sake, proposed an economic bill of rights just before he died. It was a list of rights proposed during his State of the Union Address of that year. In it, he "suggested that the nation had come to recognize, and should now implement, a second 'bill of rights.' Roosevelt's argument was that the 'political rights' guaranteed by the constitution and the Bill of Rights had 'proved inadequate to assure us equality in the pursuit of happiness.' Roosevelt's remedy was to declare an "economic bill of rights" which would guarantee:
-Employment, with a living wage
-Freedom from unfair competition and monopolies
-Housing
-Medical care
-Education
-Social security
And the thing is, I think we all agree that we are--or were--the wealthiest nation on the planet. That seems self-evident. And I think we could have done this, I think we could have given ourselves the above but instead of taking care of the nation and of ourselves, we've plowed far, far too much money and materiel into war and defense, even when it wasn't necessary.
For anyone and everyone that thinks that what he or anyone else means by proposing this is that we have "big government" and a nanny state I say stop. That is not what we're talking about at all.
If we took our nation's wealth and ability--and more nations did the same--and plowed it into the people's well-being and yes, infrastructure (roads, bridges, sewage and sewer systems, schools, transportation, etc.), instead of, again, defense and weapons of war, all people and nations of the world would benefit. There would be rising standards of living instead of falling. People would be fed, clothed, housed and have health care and so on.
Think about it.
If we had all been on this path long ago, the former Soviet Union wouldn't have collapsed and wouldn't have had to. They'd have been taking care of their people instead of squandering the nation's wealth on bombs and aircraft to carry them. All nations of the world could have spent less on war and weapons of war.
Unfortunately, the US has, since the Cold War, at least, has continued spending outrageously high sums on defense, even to this day. And it's incredibly high spending both in terms of our own Gross National Product (GDP) and that of all the other nation's spending on defense.
It's crazy. It's unfounded. It's unnecessary. It's obscene.
And it's all those things especially when you know there is so much poverty in our nation and so many go with little food and/or little or no schooling and millions go without good health care, etc.
It won't happen. At least, it won't happen anytime soon but we need to cut defense spending deeply and across the board. We--and the world--need to transfer over to a world of taking care of one another, instead of worrying about some big, ugly "bogeyman" that doesn't exist, by the way, and that may "take us over."
We, the people, need to push for this. We all need to get educated on why and how this should happen. And then we need to make it happen as soon as possible.
Here's hoping.
Links: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Bill_of_Rights
Showing posts with label striving for peace. Show all posts
Showing posts with label striving for peace. Show all posts
Saturday, October 13, 2012
Sunday, June 3, 2012
Tuesday, January 24, 2012
Wednesday, February 9, 2011
Quote of the day--on war and peace
"Heroism on command, senseless violence, and all the loathsome nonsense that goes by the name of patriotism -- how passionately I hate them!" --Albert Einstein
Friday, February 4, 2011
Quote of the day--on war--and peace
"Can anything be stupider than that a man has the right to kill me because he lives on the other side of a river and his ruler has quarrel with mine, though I have not quarreled with him?" --Blaise Pascal (French Mathematician, Philosopher and Physicist, 1623-1662)
Wednesday, January 5, 2011
Quote of the day--on war
"A great war leaves the country with three armies - an army of cripples, an army of mourners, and an army of thieves." --German Proverb
Thursday, December 30, 2010
1967 to today--not enough has changed
It was 1967 when Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. endured a hurricane of criticism when he came out publicly against the war in Vietnam and called the United States government “the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today.”
Fact is, he hadn't seen anything near what we've become in that respect.
Sick.
And we're still not analyzing that any.
Not really.
Not yet.
Link to original post: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/25/opinion/25herbert.html?_r=1&src=me&ref=general
Fact is, he hadn't seen anything near what we've become in that respect.
Sick.
And we're still not analyzing that any.
Not really.
Not yet.
Link to original post: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/25/opinion/25herbert.html?_r=1&src=me&ref=general
Sunday, November 14, 2010
Quote of the day--on peace
"...peace does not rest in the charters and covenants alone. It lies in the hearts and minds of all people. So let us not rest all our hopes on parchment and on paper, let us strive to build peace, a desire for peace, a willingness to work for peace in the hearts and minds of all of our people. I believe that we can. I believe the problems of human destiny are not beyond the reach of human beings." —President John F. Kennedy
Are we not still the people who desire and work for peace?
If not, why not?
If we are, what are we doing to get us out of these wars?
Think good thoughts, folks.
And enjoy your beautiful Sunday.
Are we not still the people who desire and work for peace?
If not, why not?
If we are, what are we doing to get us out of these wars?
Think good thoughts, folks.
And enjoy your beautiful Sunday.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


