The credit rating company Fitch has publicly warned today that we, the US, risk losing our AAA credit rating because of this Republican Party government shutdown, should it continue. Meanwhile, this Republican Party President warned he would be only too willing to let the shutdown go on for weeks or even months.
What the heck?
He's always gotten his way up to now so why shouldn't this, too, go his way?
Finally, not even the people down there at the Southern border think there's any crisis.
In four of these, the pick is our Chiefs, with the number one pick being Chiefs vs. Rams!
16. Colts vs. Rams: Nothing wrong with Andrew Luck vs. Jared Goff, and this would be a fresh matchup. Just not a lot of sex appeal and the Rams have a limited fan base.
15. Colts vs. Saints: Same deal, except New Orleans has a much larger fan base and wouldn’t be far from home. This is also a rematch of Super Bowl XLIV. Blowout potential is higher than you’d like.
14. Colts vs. Cowboys: What we’re saying is there really are no terrible potential matchups left. Nothing wrong with these two teams, and the Cowboys are the Cowboys — very popular and very polarizing. But neither team feels Super Bowl-worthy this year.
13. Chiefs vs. Cowboys: This would be fun, but there’s not much to it and Kansas City would be a clear-cut favorite.
12. Chargers vs. Cowboys: This is basically on the same level as Kansas City-Dallas, except the Chargers are chasing their first-ever Super Bowl on the back nine of Philip Rivers’ career and there’s a better chance this would be a close game.
11. Chargers vs. Eagles: Everything we just said about the Chargers, but now you’ve got the Nick Foles magic and Philadelphia chasing back-to-back championships — something nobody has done in the last decade.
10. Colts vs. Eagles: Andrew Luck and the Colts might be slightly more of a draw than the Bolts.
9. Chargers vs. Saints: Philip Rivers vs. predecessor Drew Brees would be interesting, but I’d be concerned about a potential New Orleans blowout. The Saints would practically be at home against a team that lacks a fan base.
8. Chargers vs. Rams: Even though the two franchises lack large fan bases, a battle between two teams from the same city would be pretty damn fantastic.
7. Chiefs vs. Eagles: Philly going for the repeat against the league’s highest-scoring team in a battle between former colleagues Andy Reid and Doug Pederson.
6. Patriots vs. Rams: Can the Patriots beat the team they defeated in their first Super Bowl in order to win their sixth?
5. Patriots vs. Cowboys: This would be a freakin’ ratings bonanza for CBS. Quite possibly the two highest-profile teams in the NFL, but I’d fear a New England blowout.
4. Chiefs vs. Saints: Patrick Mahomes vs. Drew Brees in a battle between the league’s two most valuable players, and it’d probably be close.
3. Patriots vs. Saints: Tom Brady and Drew Brees are two of the most accomplished quarterbacks in NFL history, and you’d have an interesting dynamic with New England chasing its sixth Lombardi Trophy in essentially a road game only 400 miles from New Orleans.
2. Patriots vs. Eagles: This would mark only the second time in NFL history in which teams met in back-to-back Super Bowls, and this one would be especially intriguing because Philly is once again led by Nick Foles while the Patriots are trying to bolster their incredible legacy.
And the one we really want to see:
1. Chiefs vs. Rams: When they met during the regular season, the two most lethal offensive teams in the NFL only combined for 105 points in the first-ever NFL game in which both teams scored 50.
Don't look now, folks, but guess who was back in town---and says he's running for political office?
First this--I apologize for the blurry photos but that, ladies and gentlemen of Kansas City, is one Clay Chastain.
You remember Clay, right?
The guy who has all the answers for our fair city?
Even though he lives, most of the time in--where is it? Virginia?
Anyway, seems he was not only back in town this weekend, this is him outside the Brookside Price Chopper grocery, and he was saying he's running for political office, yessiree, Bob.
So don't think we have, you have seen or heard the last of Mr. Clay "I Know What This City Needs" Chastain.
It's my hope that, if he's actually serious about running for city political office for us again, that someone in the media like Steve Kraske on KCUR or someone down at the the Star or the Pitch or Mike Shanin at KCPT's "Ruckus" or someone, somewhere interviews the man. We need to know just what he's planning. Or working on.
If he's serious about running for office, and I'm sure he is, he needs to get the word out and we need to hear it.
It's true. Before Donald Trump became President, which even now pains me to say, I believed in America. I believed in people. I believed in progress.
Now that Donald Trump not only became President but has been so for 2 years, all that is gone.
I no longer believe in the arc of progress through history. I no longer believe in the progress of humankind. I no longer see or believe in progress as being inevitable and/or natural. I don't assume it any longer.
It's the same with racism in our nation.
I used to see it as something deeply stupid that used to exist and occur in our society. I used to see it as something we would and were naturally working away from, having learned our collective lessons.
Again, with this President---a member and now leader of the Republican Party it needs to be repeatedly pointed out--racism has not just reared its ugly head but come out very publicly, repeatedly and demonstrably.
I thought we'd all learned that lesson. I thought we knew better. I thought we were weaning ourselves of that outrageous ignorance.
This President doesn't believe in it. So naturally, we don't need our government or the governments of the world to do anything about it. Forget the science. Forget the scientific studies. Forget the facts and truth. Full, polluting speed ahead.
Then there's the safety nets we already decided on as a nation that this President is rolling back.
But Reagan and Dubya' both became President and we lived through it and I knew we would.
But Trump? Donald J. Trump as President?
In these fast two years with him in the White House, I see so many ways not just our nation but the world has gone and is going backward, already. It has made all kinds of things that were previously considered impossible, possible.
I do see some glimmers of hope. They are only brief and glimmers but there are some promising things out there. Here's one.
While I've lost hope, I am still of the opinion we have to fight ignorance and stupidity and short-sightedness and greed. We can't give in completely. We have to work, however and whenever and wherever we can to better things, both for others and ourselves. Always.
In the past week, quite by accident, I've heard two different stories from two completely unconnected people, women, as chance would have it, about health care travesties. They highlight, very well, the ugly insanity of how we do health care.
The first was from a woman who said she worked full time at a law office and for her family's health insurance, she paid $600 per month.
That's the whole story.
One person, one woman, trying to support her family and the best her company--heck, our nation--could offer her was to pay $600 per month for health care insurance.
She rightly and truly pointed out, too, that this didn't include the huge, thousands of dollars minimums she'd have to pay first if there were any health care needs nor does it include the co-pays.
That alone is, as the headline says, obscene and immoral.
Is it any wonder health care costs are the number one cause of bankruptcy in this nation?
The second example was from a co-worker, by chance, this afternoon. I heard her talking that she had, some time ago, gone to her doctor's office and had some sort of health care episode of some kind. She was in her doctor's office by coincidence, for something else, entirely. The doctor's office was physically attached to the hospital. One could go through the hallways to get there.
Once she started having this "episode"--I don't know what the ailment was--they told the doctor's staff, naturally. That staff informed the woman they would not only call an ambulance but that--get this--THEY HAD TO CALL THE AMBULANCE. She couldn't go through the building or even go around to the front door or something. An ambulance had to be called, she had to be put into it and be taken to the emergency entrance.
So that's what happened.
And because of that, she was billed $800.
$800 for an ambulance trip, AROUND THE BUILDING, not even a block, that took seconds.
This is a woman who doesn't make a great deal of money, ladies and gentlemen.
We seem to not have any sense when it comes to health care in this nation. We're all about companies and corporations making loads of money and having big profits but we don't care about the costs.
Again, WE ARE THE ONLY NATION THAT DOES THIS.
We, the US, are the only nation in the world that ties health and health care to profit and profits.
Consequently, we are the only nation that has citizens that go bankrupt due to health care costs.
We are the only nation that has people die because they can't afford treatment. We are the only nation that has people die because they can't afford insulin, as just one perfect example.
We just are not very bright. In spite of what we tell ourselves.
Southwest Border Apprehensions and Individuals “Inadmissible” at Ports of Entry Compared by Fiscal Year
Source: U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
The report reflected reality: Border Patrol apprehensions along the Southwest border plummeted by approximately 80%, from a high of over 1.6 million in FY 2000, to around 300,000 in FY 2017. (Apprehensions are considered a proxy for illegal entry, so the fewer apprehensions, the less illegal entry.) Ironically, the government’s own data show that illegal entry by family units is actually down in FY 2018...
And then, on this, the Christmas, holidays, Federal Government shutdown, there is this.
"A survey of 134 American CEOs was conducted during last week's Yale CEO Summit in New York."
What they're concerned about? Check out their number one concern.
1. President Donald Trump
Naturally, Mr. Trump figures in 3 out of the four.
2. The arrest of Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou — and Trump's potential intervention.
3. A recession caused by political instability.
Some information on this one:
Half of respondents expressed fear the US could wind up in a recession by the end of the year.
Sixty-seven per cent blamed political instability in the nation and trade negotiations.
More from CEOs on Mr. Trump.
Three-quarters of CEOs say they've apologized for Trump's rhetoric
Three-quarters of CEOs said they find themselves apologizing to international partners about the president's rhetoric, according to a survey of attendees at the Yale School of Management's CEO summit. The invitation-only meeting, which took place in New York last week, claimed 134 attendees, including the CEOs of Ford, Morgan Stanley and Verizon, according to The New York Times.
The people who should, you might think, be for this man since he's for little government regulation and low corporate taxes but they have to apologize for this man's, for our leader's actions and words.
And in spite of the CEOs having to make these apologies for him, for us, Mr. Trump thinks he's doing a bangup job. Why, just ask him.
President Donald Trump's re-election campaign team appears to have issued its first ad, with a message calling on "every Trump supporter" to call an 800 number to thank the president for his leadership...
In the ad, 2020 campaign manager Brad Parscale makes the claim that Trump has "achieved more during his time in office than any president in history."
Next up, today, at least for now, there is his folding like a cheap suit.
He had promised his supporters and threatened the Democrats and Congress that he wanted his border wall on the Southern border, all 5 billion dollars of it. He said if he didn't get it, he'd shut down the government.
For whatever good reason--common sense struck?--he backed off. That's what people do who are only committed to themselves and money. He has no allegiances or commitments to anything but, again, himself, his own perceived, best self-interests and yes, money. That's it with this guy.
Finally, there is this and it is, by itself, huge.
“The Trump Foundation — the charitable foundation started by President Donald Trump years before he became a presidential candidate, which New York's top prosecutor said exhibited a ‘shocking pattern of illegality’ — will dissolve according to a court filing.”
But wait. There’s more:
“Our petition detailed a shocking pattern of illegality involving the Trump Foundation — including unlawful coordination with the Trump presidential campaign, repeated and willful self-dealing, and much more… This amounted to the Trump Foundation functioning as little more than a checkbook to serve Mr. Trump’s business and political interests."
Then there’s the good news.
“It does not stop the lawsuit by AG’s office has filed against the foundation, which was formed in 1987, and that action will continue”
So who knows what's next with this man? There's no telling what he'll do or say or tweet, of course, as we've seen in these 2 bizarre first years. And with the Mueller investigation's results not even released yet, the only thing we can count on is more unpredictability.
Still in the bottom, bad half, at 28 but at least they’re more in the middle, than the low, low worst ¼
. 28. Kansas
Total score: 56.21 Ranking for women’s economic and social well-being: 33rd Ranking for women’s health and safety: 25th
Kansas performs better in the category of women’s health and safety than it does when it comes to women’s economic and social well-being.
Texas, still in the bottom, worst half at 42. Shame on you, Texas.
Neighboring Nebraska, in the far more respectable top half
Total score: 64.82 Ranking for women’s economic and social well-being: 19th Ranking for women’s health and safety: 14th
Nebraska shares the distinction of having the lowest unemployment rate for women with four other states. Going the other way, next door Illinois ranks far higher and better.
Total score: 69.07 Ranking for women’s economic and social well-being: 7th Ranking for women’s health and safety: 20th
Only two states have a lower homicide rate for women than Illinois, which also boasts the fourth-highest median earnings for female workers.
Now, to the North? Iowa In the top 10.
Total score: 69.11 Ranking for women’s economic and social well-being: 10th Ranking for women’s health and safety: 9th
Iowa boasts the fifth-highest high-school graduation rate for young women.
No. 1 position??
I’m very proud and happy to say my daughter’s adopted state of Minnesota is number 1! Fantastic!
Total score: 78.22 Ranking for women’s economic and social well-being: 1st Ranking for women’s health and safety: 3rd
Minnesota, hats off to you! The Land of 10,000 Lakes topped the list of best states for women by three points. It’s easy to see why — and tough to find a positive economic marker this state doesn’t possess. Minnesota has the third-highest life expectancy rate for women, the fifth-lowest rate of women without insurance, the fourth-highest women’s high-school graduation rate, the fifth-lowest percentage of women in poverty and the second-highest median earnings for working women. Go, Gophers!
One interesting side note, North Dakota came down at an extremely respectable 4 on the list while neighboring South Dakota was far tougher on women at 24.
Missouri and these other low-ranking states would do well to look around and see just what, precisely these other, higher-ranking states are doing to get these results. Not only is this for 1/2 of our population but it's for our mothers, daughters, sisters, cousins, all.
It's not like we have to go far for the answers, after all.
You certainly have seen the play by now—you would have had to go out of your way to avoid seeing it. It was late in the first half of Sunday’s Chiefs-Ravens game, a second-and-1. Patrick Mahomes zigged to the left, then zagged back to the right, evading the rush as he scanned the field. Then, with his head pointed squarely downfield, he slung the ball across his body, firing it diagonally across the hash marks and painted field numbers to his left. Receiver Demarcus Robinson, crossing the field, made the catch at a spot where Mahomes had given zero outward indication he was going to throw.
“Look at the magic of the quarterback,” Tony Romo said on the CBS broadcast while watching the replay of the 17-yard pass to Robinson. “Moving around, dancing, then throws it—like, almost, no look. That’s incredible.”
First, there was gerrymandering--sculpting out voting districts from your state that benefits your own political party.
Both parties did it, sure, but then the Republicans decided it was one helluva great idea so they REALLY went with it. They carved up their constituents voting districts so it put the 8 ball in their corner pocket, time and again, getting them elected.
This is how gerrymandering works.
And here's an example:
They decided that wasn't enough, they scare the people and tell them there were people out there--"fereners", illegals, illegal immigrants and others who were trying and lying to vote, left and right.
And the best way to stop it? The best way to stop these people from voting illegally?
Why, we got yer voter ID laws right here, folks, right here in River City.
Forget that all hard data on it, time and again, state to state, across the nation, down through time shows there is extremely little to no vote fraud going on. Forget that, ignore that. It's surely "out there." They're out there, just waiting to vote illegally. Sure they are.
They lost. In at least 3 states, North Carolina, Michigan and Wisconsin Republicans lost.
They had all that gerrymandering and voter ID laws going for them, taking away votes from fellow Americans, tax-paying citizens but they still lost.
So what do they do?
At the last minute, before they're summarily thrown out of office---by the electorate, by the voters--they rush to put in place new laws that strip power from the incoming--Democratic--office holders.
Understand, folks. These people who do this--and yes, they're all in the Republican Party, factually--are not out there for the people first. They're not out there for their constituents first. They're not out there for their District or state or the nation first. No, sir and ma'am, they absolutely are not.
They are out there for themselves and for their political party, above all. They are "party firsters", for sure.
Worse than that, far worse, they are out there for the political party first AND last.
Nebraska, worst, worst, last place, of the 50 states followed far too closely by Kansas at 47th place and Missouri, next, at 46. Neighboring Iowa at 38. Arkansas, too, in the bottom, worse half, at 32. Oklahoma, 29.
Way to go, Midwestern states.
You don’t have mountains, you don’t have an ocean and you also don’t have good tax policies for retirees.
Besides less traffic and hopefully cleaner skies, what do you have?
Note to retirees: Check out the states that have both no income tax and no tax on Social Security.
In the #1 best spot on the list for most friendly to retirees?
Check out that map.
Worst tax rates for retirees, right in the center of the nation.